Quote:
First one is absolutely closed system with accumulative social enthropy, which will blow up state early or later. This state has 3 (I think you can find more) possibilities to survive in long term period: 1) convert population to mindless mass; 2) kill large amount of inconsistent people or remove them to a very distant places (hey, Australia  ) and be at intensive brainwashing and freedom restriction for others; 3) create mighty artificial enemy (alternative evil state, aliens), but this is transient treat.
Which one do you like best of all?
|
As someone whose ancestor was shipped to Australia on the first fleet (Sort of like the Mayflower but without a choice
) I'm kind of fond of number 2
I would support a unified world government. Multiculturalism is a bit of a catchphrase in Australia, but I disagree with it. In my mind many different cultures all believing in different things cause conflict. They all believe their culture is superior and refuse to see anyone elses point of view. Better that everyone in the world be forced to all believe in the same thing. As for a space "Empire", it is dependant on a mode of travel fast enough to ensure communication between different planets. If the only means to travel is slow, such as a generational ark, then each planet will evolve its own culture.
Re: Semi-OT: Planetary governments
Threaded Mode