Re: I think I now understand Cohen
storm, do not elide the question. please give me a specific historical analogy for an action such as Zap was threatening to do. ie. names, places, etc.
since, in fact if anything you were the arch-enemy, as I had not been in any conflict at all, your claim of historical basis is especially weak.
As well, no one, least of all me, claimed that sending gems and items is not a legitimate and/or common tactic; or that there was something wrong w/ sending the remnants of your wealth to an ally when you are about to lose. Neither of these is appropriate to the present situation. Cohen had relatively few resources at the end, and he did not send until he had truly been defeated.
Zap did not threaten to send "some gems" or whatever. He threatened to throw the game such that you would receive his whole empire; which is even now one of the largest and most powerful in the game. You yourself said that that was not how you wished to win. It is not "name calling" to say that such behaviour is unsportsmanlike, childish, or petulant. It is every bit as bad as threatening to go AI: both do great damage to the game. In fact, throwing a game does the greater harm.
|
Threaded Mode