|
|
|
 |

September 16th, 2004, 08:18 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions II In-Game Typos
Quote:
Alneyan said:
Speaking of the Atlantian Scout, this unit is also the standard scout for R'lyeh. Is it intended to be so?
|
I think so. R'lyeh uses enslaved Atlantian troops, like the slave troopers and meteorite guards, so why not Atlantian scouts? Saves the trouble of making a separate scout unit for them. After all, most nations have the same scout unit, monster #426, it's just been defined into their unit selections. I suppose the reason the Atlantian scout doesn't have a description text is that R'lyeh and Atlantis are supposed to be mortal enemies and it'd be difficult to come up with a short description that was nation-specific and accommodated both nations at the same time. I suppose I could try and write one and forward that to Illwinter to see if they think it's good enough to be included in the game.
Edi
|

September 21st, 2004, 09:39 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Solomon Islands
Posts: 1,180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions II In-Game Typos
Ok, this annoyed me. The "Power of the Eye" scenario says:
"The player who takes control over the Desert Eye or the Void Gate wins."
This is a lie! I just started playing the scenario SP as Ulm, and I happened to start near the Desert Eye, so I just built a big army, hired lots of mercs and crashed into there and managed to successfully storm the place on turn 20 or thereabouts. And I didn't win! Victory condition is 2 points and I found out that each site is worth 1 victory point, so you need both sites!
|

September 23rd, 2004, 04:32 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 25
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions II In-Game Typos
Hmm. Thats bad I suppose. I do not even remember what was intended anymore. Only one should do fine.
|

September 27th, 2004, 05:40 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Forlì, Italy
Posts: 322
Thanks: 15
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions II In-Game Typos
Very little typo:
The hoburg commander is described to have a mace but it is depicted (and has) a shortsword.
|

October 2nd, 2004, 07:52 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions II In-Game Typos
The Capricorn does not have a description. I have only seen this unit in Gandalf's random maps however, and so do not know how to recruit it (or can it be actually recruited somewhere? I have yet to see it through "normal" means).
|

October 2nd, 2004, 08:08 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions II In-Game Typos
Quote:
Alneyan said:
The Capricorn does not have a description. I have only seen this unit in Gandalf's random maps however, and so do not know how to recruit it (or can it be actually recruited somewhere? I have yet to see it through "normal" means).
|
This is one of the new units that looks like it fits with an underwater Pangaea/Atlantis theme, complete with Icthysatyrs and such.
|

October 6th, 2004, 10:54 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Berlin
Posts: 300
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Dominions II In-Game Typos
When a unit is mistformed in battle (due to the spell), the mistform icon's description says somewhere "ben" instead of "been".
__________________
Shut your mouth, it could open your mind! - from Skyclad's On With Their Heads!
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|