| 
 | 
     
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
 
    
    
 
    
     
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
 
    
    
 
    
    
 | 
       | 
      
 
 
	
		  | 
	
	
 
 
		
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				November 10th, 2004, 09:35 PM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				Shrapnel Fanatic 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Location: CHEESE! 
					
					
						Posts: 10,009
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: OT:Tempted to get this book
	
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!  
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++ 
  Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead. 
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
			  
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				November 10th, 2004, 09:41 PM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
 
  
			
				
				
				Major 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: May 2003 
					Location: Solomon Islands 
					
					
						Posts: 1,180
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: OT:Tempted to get this book
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		He also repeatedly claims that the "twin paradox" and the atomic clock experiment relating to the effect of time dilation is logically faulty because movement is relative. However, in standard science, it is not movement that is responsible for the time dilation effect but acceleration. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				November 10th, 2004, 10:11 PM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				Shrapnel Fanatic 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Location: CHEESE! 
					
					
						Posts: 10,009
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: OT:Tempted to get this book
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				deccan said: 
He also repeatedly claims that the "twin paradox" and the atomic clock experiment relating to the effect of time dilation is logically faulty because movement is relative. However, in standard science, it is not movement that is responsible for the time dilation effect but acceleration.  
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 Interesting. The common assumption I've always encountered is that the closer one gets to light speed, the slower time goes.
 
What's a good 'physics for dummies' book?  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!  
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++ 
  Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead. 
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
			  
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				November 11th, 2004, 10:01 PM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				Colonel 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Jun 2002 
					Location: Connecticut 
					
					
						Posts: 1,518
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: OT:Tempted to get this book
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				narf poit chez BOOM said: 
What's a good 'physics for dummies' book?  
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 If you'd like an Online resource  The Motion Mountain  is pretty famous and well respected.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				November 12th, 2004, 04:11 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				Shrapnel Fanatic 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Location: CHEESE! 
					
					
						Posts: 10,009
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: OT:Tempted to get this book
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		Since it brings up that 'if it only moves halfway' arguement, I'm as skeptical about it as I am about the other book. 
 
That supposed quandry has been solved numerous times. It only moves halfway if you only look at half the time. It imposes an artificial restriction on a natural phonomenon and then claims that the natural phonomenon must follow this artificial restriction and therefore this natural canot phonomenon occur. How are we to get rid of this quandary? Same way a rational person solves all arguements involving arrows and turtles. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!  
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++ 
  Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead. 
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
			  
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				November 12th, 2004, 11:21 PM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				Shrapnel Fanatic 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Location: CHEESE! 
					
					
						Posts: 10,009
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: OT:Tempted to get this book
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				narf poit chez BOOM said: 
Since it brings up that 'if it only moves halfway' arguement, I'm as skeptical about it as I am about the other book. 
 
That supposed quandry has been solved numerous times. It only moves halfway if you only look at half the time. It imposes an artificial restriction on a natural phonomenon and then claims that the natural phonomenon must follow this artificial restriction and therefore this natural canot phonomenon occur. How are we to get rid of this quandary? Same way a rational person solves all arguements involving arrows and turtles.  
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 Sorry, I think I was too sarcastic here.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!  
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++ 
  Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead. 
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
			  
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				November 10th, 2004, 09:47 PM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
 
  
			
				
				
				Major 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: May 2003 
					Location: Solomon Islands 
					
					
						Posts: 1,180
					 
					 
	Thanks: 0 
	
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: OT:Tempted to get this book
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		That's a valid point, but one can't help but notice and comment on the observation that the author's behavior is very similar to that of a snake-oil salesman. "Buy this book and all will be revealed!" His free preview chapter supposedly pokes holes in standard science, but stops just short of revealing how his final theory resolves the problems.
 
If he were really serious about scientific inquiry, he should have made the essential theory itself freely available.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
 
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools | 
	
 
	| 
	
	
	
	 | 
	
 
	| Display Modes | 
	
 
	
	
	
	
		
		  Hybrid Mode 
		
	 
	
	 | 
	
	
 
 
	
		
	
		 
		Posting Rules
	 | 
 
	
		
		You may not post new threads 
		You may not post replies 
		You may not post attachments 
		You may not edit your posts 
		 
		
		
		
		
		HTML code is On 
		 
		
	  | 
 
 
	 | 
	
		
	 | 
 
 
     |  
 |