|
|
|
|
November 11th, 2004, 12:06 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Stalings et al.
i say, let knudsens friend fill in as ulm. ulm has enough problems with ai pangae and indys. and if ulm would be ai also, then it would be way to easy for ermor to conquer dem northern lands. can we make non-agression-agreedment between new-ulm and ermor for a 15 turns? would that be ok for rex_havok?
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Threaded Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
