|
|
|
 |
|

January 6th, 2005, 11:41 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Terrans
Quote:
Suicide Junkie said:
A mere three enemy ships at linearly independent vectors can make the ship vulnerable no matter what orientation it is in.
In any large combat, the plates would be of little use. Just spread out, and pick off the ships you have a clear shot at... if they try to angle towards you, somebody else in your fleet will get a shot.
|
On the other hand, doing that will also likely put your ships out of mutual support range and make defeat in detail more likely.
Consider a cruiser firing missles at your fleet. Would you rather have those ships close enough to ALL engage the incoming missiles with PDC, or spread apart so only the targeted ship could hit it?
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

January 6th, 2005, 11:53 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: The Terrans
With realistic combat being fought at reasonable distances, sure.
I was thinking more along the lines of the overlapping formations and dogfighting I see in SE4 combat...
BTW, in the example there, I'd rather have at least that one ship be able to return fire effectively, rather than none of them. 
__________________
Things you want:
|

January 7th, 2005, 09:14 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 995
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: The Terrans
Don't worry Aiken. In art, as in life, I refuse to succumb to the demands of reality. And as a matter of fact, the original design I had for these ships actually had the armor plates wrap all the way around the ship so only the front and rear would be exposed, but it ended up looking, well, alien. And when you're making a shipset for humans, if it looks alien, you've failed in your design concept.
__________________
Suction feet are not to be trifled with!
|

January 7th, 2005, 10:17 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 995
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: The Terrans
I decided I didn't quite like the look of the Cruiser, so here's an updated Version. Improvement, yes or no?
__________________
Suction feet are not to be trifled with!
|

January 7th, 2005, 10:39 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Terrans
I like the new look better.
|

January 7th, 2005, 11:22 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Terrans
The new one is definitely better. 
|

January 7th, 2005, 11:24 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: The Terrans
What's with the two shield plates facing each other in the center of the ship?
__________________
Things you want:
|

January 8th, 2005, 01:28 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Taganrog, Russia
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Terrans
Quote:
Suicide Junkie said:
What's with the two shield plates facing each other in the center of the ship?
|
Well, if the first engine will be destroyed in battle, inner armor could protect second engine of explosion consequences.
note on ship: it's a nice one, but due to mirror effect the hull itself seems translucent in some places.
|

January 8th, 2005, 02:26 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: The Terrans
Ah, and its probably easier to mass manufacture the rounded plates instead of making a custom one for the middle.
__________________
Things you want:
|

January 8th, 2005, 10:53 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 995
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: The Terrans
Quote:
aiken said:
Well, if the first engine will be destroyed in battle, inner armor could protect second engine of explosion consequences. 
note on ship: it's a nice one, but due to mirror effect the hull itself seems translucent in some places.
|
True, and it also ensures a near miss on one engine pod won't carry through and hit the other one. Mainly though, it's an artistic condideration, it just looks better to have the armor plates in there rather than a big empty space..
__________________
Suction feet are not to be trifled with!
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|