|
|
|
 |

January 16th, 2005, 04:01 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: designcreation problems again
The AI designs the first Version of each ship class available. It believes that it is the most advanced. So, it will always use the 100 kT Attack Ship over the 220 kT Version simply because it comes before it in the file.
Also, it is a good idea to use something like Attack Base instead of Attack Ship for scouts, to keep them separate from actual warships.
Ragnarok-X, Pathfinder does have a valid point about your handling of the mod situation... You can't possibly hope to insult someone's work and not have them feel personally insulted, especially when they invested so much time in it.
|

January 16th, 2005, 05:15 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany / Bielefeld
Posts: 2,035
Thanks: 33
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: designcreation problems again
Thanks for the help everyone. I didnt knew the minimum/maximum entry was actually referring to the amount of engines, but to the achieved movement points. Helped me alot.
Lastly, about my post regarding pathfinder. I actually think HE should be more polite.
After all this is a free world and mods are fan`s work, so i guess its okay if i dont like a certain mod and begin to redo it.
In addition "my" B5 mod is actually something totally new. The current files show almost no identical entries compared to "pathfinder"s Version,
I may just call it "Proper B5" (jk) or something. You need to understand, that im, as a big fan of B5, looking forward to have a good time with the mod, which is not possible with the current one. Its pretty easy to understand. There is one babylon 5 mod game going on at PBW. Compared to the influence of B5 and its fanbase, its pretty dissapointing.
At any rate, if the revision turns out as crap, you can blame me all you want, i wouldnt care.
Then again, whats a boor ?
|

January 16th, 2005, 05:17 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany / Bielefeld
Posts: 2,035
Thanks: 33
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: designcreation problems again
Oh yeah, even the weapons are being redone by TS, so in the end everything will be "new". If pathfinder would actually like B5 he would help me/us or at least post suggestions. Instead he is talking about me insulting him, and you people actually agree ? Oh well, wrong world...
|

January 16th, 2005, 05:59 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Taganrog, Russia
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: designcreation problems again
Boor is a rude, impolite person.
You certainly wouldn't want to get an ill fame, would you?
I have this problem too - make Posts before thinking about an impression which this post can make. But I try to get rid of this habit.
|

January 16th, 2005, 06:47 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany / Bielefeld
Posts: 2,035
Thanks: 33
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: designcreation problems again
Anyways, i isolated the problem. In the 220 kT design, once i delete the must have ability "weapon" and adjust the rest of the must have abilites it will work. The game will design this vehicle and build it just fine. So its definitly something about the weapons...but WHAT ?!! There is enough space left for at least 1 weapon (2 if you count the secondary) and the weapon family DOES exist.......i cant believe it. i`ve done so much AI editing and cant solve this problem...enough space, family exists and i even deleted the tech requirements for the weapon so its accessable immediatly...still it wont design it.
Any suggestions, please ?!
|

January 16th, 2005, 08:01 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: designcreation problems again
You are assigning by weapon family, not component family, right?
|

January 16th, 2005, 08:36 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Midlothian, Va, USA
Posts: 2,142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: designcreation problems again
Quote:
Imperator Fyron said:
You are assigning by weapon family, not component family, right?
|
What IF said. Note: FAMILY number for weapon.
Also be absolutely sure there are NO typos anywhere associated with that weapon.
*Hands Ragnarok-X a non-aspirin pain-killer*
__________________
L++, Gd?, $++, Fr-, C---, S*, T?, Sf+++, Tcp, A+, Bb++@, M++, MpB5, MpT, MpD, MpSa, MpM, RV, Pwt, Fqt, Nd-, Rpt, G+, Au, Mmt,S++, Ss+,
|

January 17th, 2005, 01:44 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany / Bielefeld
Posts: 2,035
Thanks: 33
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: designcreation problems again
Quote:
Imperator Fyron said:
You are assigning by weapon family, not component family, right?
|
Hey, once again i owe you. That was the mistake i made. Thanks a friggin bunch !!!
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|