|
|
|
 |

February 7th, 2005, 11:08 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Automation vs Micromanagement
The game situation does change at quite a pace; however, moving armies around behind the front line (particularly with 20+ forts) is fiddly and annoying when you should be able to set a destination and just change it later if needed. How hard would it be to have a 'move to prov no. 49' order? Your client can work out the quickest route and reset the orders on that unit at the start of each turn, from a server perspective it would be totally transparent. The order could be changed any time before hosting, just like normal. No negative game effects, some positive game effects... I can see why there is such resistance to it!
False dilemmas can be fun - Nobody wants a Nintendo game; I'm simply requesting sensible scripting to reduce player workload. Players should be able to be as manual as the like or not. Turn length could be reduced by allowing values (moves, scripted strat orders, whatever) to carry over between moves: I'm glad noone has contested this. Whether it suits your style of play is unfortunately irrelevant. I'd never even considered PBEM: the games format does indeed fit well with that method of play. Guess what? There are OTHER ways of playing too. I'm not sure exactly where 'making things easier on the player' translates into 'heretical attack on PBEM roots of game' in your mind, GP.
The game would still be opaque, would still eject 95% of players within 10 minutes, would still be deep and flexible and the only decent fantasy strat in existence. It would just be easier to play, and maybe even have more players. We wouldn't want that now, would we.
|

February 8th, 2005, 01:29 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 605
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Automation vs Micromanagement
Im sure its nothing personal. The knee-jerk reaction of nearly everyone on this forum is to label someone a heretic for suggesting something new. You should have seen what happened to Boron and I when we suggested upkeep for summons. People still hate me for that, and it was 6 months ago.
__________________
Every time you download music, God kills a kitten.
|

February 8th, 2005, 02:41 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Automation vs Micromanagement
Quote:
Play by EMAIL? Christ. No wonder you people are so anti-automation; you've got DAYS per turn.
|
You make statements like that and call people PBEM nazis, yet take offense about being called a heretic?
Anyways, I don't think anyone is against automation, but 1.) everyone has their own concept of the 'best' way to eliminate micromanagement and 2.) I think many people would rather see improvement in other areas first.
|

February 8th, 2005, 02:45 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 25
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: Automation vs Micromanagement
> You should have seen what happened to Boron and I when we suggested upkeep for summons. People still hate me for that, and it was 6 months ago.
Illwinter doesn't hate you. Your suggestion has been considered, discarded, reconsidered, pondered, left alone and placed in the holding box of unused ideas several times since the first steps of dom1 were taken.
Pnakotus: You are right in your conviction that there are several automation features that would make the game easier to handle if implemented. It would be good to reduce micro. Just like it would be good to raise the 'initial reaction modifier' of the game from -5 to -3.
When we started work on Dominions 1 we were actually bothered that there would be too little to do during a turn. This was in the good old days when PBeM was the only possible way of playing multi (at least for us). Therefore we didn't bother much with MM reduction (perhaps we even increased it). 
|

February 8th, 2005, 07:18 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 605
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Automation vs Micromanagement
Quote:
Kristoffer O said:
Illwinter doesn't hate you. Your suggestion has been considered, discarded, reconsidered, pondered, left alone and placed in the holding box of unused ideas several times since the first steps of dom1 were taken.
|
I certainly wasn't accusing the great[img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Lightning.gif[/img]Illwinter[img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Lightning.gif[/img]of any such thing!!! I was refering to a few select individuals who probably know who they are and will remain unnamed. Of course, who is to say that is the only reason people dislike me? 
__________________
Every time you download music, God kills a kitten.
|

February 9th, 2005, 12:30 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, ME (USA)
Posts: 3,241
Thanks: 31
Thanked 65 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Automation vs Micromanagement
|

February 9th, 2005, 01:02 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 605
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Automation vs Micromanagement
Hey!!! You attacked me! It was your just punishment for attempting to satiate your bloodlust on the peace loving Devils of Abysia  We wouldn't hurt a fly  (unless it got in our way[img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Campfire.gif[/img]  [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Campfire.gif[/img])
__________________
Every time you download music, God kills a kitten.
|

February 9th, 2005, 09:35 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, ME (USA)
Posts: 3,241
Thanks: 31
Thanked 65 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Automation vs Micromanagement
Lies!!! Lies!!!
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|