|
|
|
|
|
View Poll Results: Searching should be automatic
|
|
Yes
|
  
|
13 |
28.89% |
|
No
|
  
|
32 |
71.11% |
 |

April 7th, 2005, 01:06 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Poll: Should Dom3 allow automatic site searchi
Quote:
Chazar said:
Quote:
quantum_mechani said:
So, you're saying that if they have the option, they would do all of the above? For instance a mage-priest set to defend would preach and research at the same time?
|
I sure cannot speak for SC, but I thought what SC meant to say was that a commander set to defend should be assigned to any one of the unit's available tasks which are guaranteed to do no harm by the server when hosting instead of allowing commander to simply stand idle...
I often issue a "search" command for priests which are waiting for other armies to arrive and that cannot preach for a higher dom-strength anyway. It usually avails nothing, but even a slight chance for a site is better than no chance of anything useful.
It might be one of the reasons why I need hours to complete a single turn. So as long as these commands cannot no any harm (i.e. preaching, searching, researching as opposed to blood hunting, patrolling, hiding...) it would save me the trouble to check all idle commanders (which is a trouble because I usually have stationary scouts on most bordering enemy provinces...)
|
hmm, I see. I suppose such a system wouldn't hurt but I doubt I would use it much. There are too many cases were you do not want the commander taking the default action, that I would probably end up going through them all anyway.
|

April 7th, 2005, 04:03 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Poll: Should Dom3 allow automatic site searchi
Could you please ginve an example? I can't see the harm in preaching, or searching for sites, if the other option was doing nothing. Auto-defaulting research might make efficient researching a chore, but you wouldn't accidentally lose any research points either. And telling mages to research (to see their RPs added to the pool) wouldn't be any worse than it would be now.
|

April 7th, 2005, 04:19 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Poll: Should Dom3 allow automatic site searchi
Quote:
SC pretenders typically don't take high levels of a single magic path, but instead spread their picks out to gain the buffing spells that they need. Bless effect pretenders and monster types are the only ones that are likely to have high single level paths.
|
I was thinking that but then I thought about cyclops, son of nifel, titan, etc. and I've seen them do double duty as bless effect and sc.
|

April 7th, 2005, 07:33 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Poll: Should Dom3 allow automatic site searchi
Quote:
Endoperez said:
Could you please ginve an example? I can't see the harm in preaching, or searching for sites, if the other option was doing nothing. Auto-defaulting research might make efficient researching a chore, but you wouldn't accidentally lose any research points either. And telling mages to research (to see their RPs added to the pool) wouldn't be any worse than it would be now.
|
I'm not saying that the system would harm anything, simply that I would be ordering my commander to use a specific action every turn anyway. So, I see no problem with it being in the game, other than the effort to implement it.
|

April 8th, 2005, 01:34 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,266
Thanks: 18
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Poll: Should Dom3 allow automatic site searchi
It would also be nice if a spellcaster set to cast a site searching spell monthly would automatically pick a new site each month that had not been searched by that spell before.
__________________
In strait places gar keep all store,
And burn the plain land them before:
Then shall they pass away in haste,
When that they find nothing but waste...
|

April 8th, 2005, 05:18 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Poll: Should Dom3 allow automatic site searchi
Quote:
Reverend Zombie said:
It would also be nice if a spellcaster set to cast a site searching spell monthly would automatically pick a new site each month that had not been searched by that spell before.
|
Quite true; that would be extremely convenient.
|

April 8th, 2005, 07:42 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Poll: Should Dom3 allow automatic site searchi
I'd like to see an option to prioritize provinces in general, rather than detailing orders to a specific mage. Particularly when casting sitesearching spells. So you could put all your Waste provinces at the top of the list and all your Farm Lands at the bottom. Site searchers of any kind would look at the top and see if it had already been searched to whatever thier ability (or spell) was, then skip to the next one etc.
|

April 8th, 2005, 07:53 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Poll: Should Dom3 allow automatic site searchi
Quote:
Ironhawk said:
I'd like to see an option to prioritize provinces in general, rather than detailing orders to a specific mage. Particularly when casting sitesearching spells. So you could put all your Waste provinces at the top of the list and all your Farm Lands at the bottom. Site searchers of any kind would look at the top and see if it had already been searched to whatever thier ability (or spell) was, then skip to the next one etc.
|
Or just let them intelligently prioritize on their own, skipping capitols, and following the known order of site probability.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|