|
|
|
|
 |

July 1st, 2005, 06:06 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 436
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Mosehansen Game, Paradise Lost
Why boatloads? I've never used Dispel... since it looks like it cost at least 70 gems to cast, does that mean one would need at least 70 to cancel it (even though the Dispel spell only costs 30 to cast)?
|

July 1st, 2005, 07:45 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Mosehansen Game, Paradise Lost
Well - look at Ermor's gem income, the highest in the game. Lots of that are going to be death gems, making it unlikely that he cast it with the minimum amount (which I thought was 80).
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|

July 2nd, 2005, 06:07 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Germany, Leverkusen
Posts: 262
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Mosehansen Game, Paradise Lost
It was 70.
:-)
|

July 2nd, 2005, 01:06 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Germany, Leverkusen
Posts: 262
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Next turn: Paradise Lost
Next turn is up, sorry i took so long
But while Burden of time, time is relativ.
I get a message every turn, how many units has been "strucked"
Have anyone an idea how much the percantance chance is for every unit to get afflictons?
|

July 3rd, 2005, 01:14 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 436
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Next turn: Paradise Lost
Next turn is up.
|

July 4th, 2005, 12:17 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Next turn: Paradise Lost
And another turn.
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|

July 4th, 2005, 08:56 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 436
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Next turn: Paradise Lost
So if a global was cast for the minimum amount for that spell + X additional gems, to cancel it with Dispel, one just needs at least X gems above the minimum cost, right?
So even though Burden of time costs 70, and let's say 10 extra was used for 80, to cancel it one wouldn't need 50 extra pearls to cancel it (since Dispel only costs 30), right? You would only need 40 (30+X). It doesn't really make it clear in the manual.
And if there are multiple globals up, you can't choose which one to Dispel, it just randomly picks one, right?
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|