|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|

July 12th, 2005, 07:13 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sweden, EU
Posts: 75
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: obat66 Sweden
Quote:
Backis said:
Nah, I just used the Zuzanna/Dana icon (the Frenchie porté is just to small... Archer is pretty big.
|
I had the privilege to climb around in one in Karlskoga some time ago. Its really a monster, and looks more like a spaceship than a artillery system. It has six onboard computers, how about that?
Regarding the OOB:s, I have the current army (at least the fighing part) organization under control. I follow the offical publications stating what a certain formation includes. Each unit however conducts their own "tests" regularly to see what functions and what does not, but I will go by the books on this one. The latest (pansarskyste) organization listed in SP is 98, today I guess 02 is correct
I dont know how deep we will want to run with the formrations. The game is a about combat, so is there any real need for "Tung kabelgrupp" or "Stridsvagnstransport"?
Anyway, I will go offline for about two weeks soon and go to the Med and spend some time with Mr San Miguel. Wont do much use for the Swedish OOB then, but I will be back  !
__________________
"The essence of war is violence. Moderation in war is imbecility"
-British Sea Lord John Fisher
|

July 12th, 2005, 05:07 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 72
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: obat66 Sweden
Have a nice holiday P.
"Kabeltattare" and other "löst folk" would only be a couple of aux infantry sections and a couple of trucks which could be bought easily enough anyway.
Not sure how we will simulate writing "Helicopter" on the side of the trucks and its implications for crossing blown bridges though...
We can just represent the TT's as in the other obat's. If anyone wants the support people, again you can just buy a couple of sections of aux inf, alternatively engineers and trucks or CEV's.
__________________
"Med ett schysst järnrör slår man hela världen med häpnad!"
–Socker-Conny
|

July 26th, 2005, 11:48 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 205
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: obat66 Sweden
Bill-2 listed as multi-charge ATGM. But isn't it top-attack ?
The same with Indian Nag ATGM - listed as multi-charge...
|

July 26th, 2005, 12:58 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 72
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: obat66 Sweden
Well, it does have a precursor charge...
No BILL version is supposed to be used in a direct attack profile against armour, but there its an option for use against soft targets such as trucks or semi-hardened types like buildings.
Irrelevant in this case though... it should be TA, nothing else.
__________________
"Med ett schysst järnrör slår man hela världen med häpnad!"
–Socker-Conny
|

July 27th, 2005, 03:58 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 24
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: obat66 Sweden
Quote:
Backis said:
Well, it does have a precursor charge... 
Irrelevant in this case though... it should be TA, nothing else.
|
Only IF the game had supported multi-Charge- Top attack.
Making it top-attack will reduce the effectiveness against ERA,
 pick one representation of reality
Cheers
/John T.
|

July 27th, 2005, 05:49 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 263
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: obat66 Sweden
I think that all Top attack ATGMs are stated as multicharge in game
|

July 28th, 2005, 12:53 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 72
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: obat66 Sweden
Making it a "dual warhead" will greatly reduce its effectiveness for frontal shots against ALL targets, especially unless you fuddle the penetration values and turn it into "Super-ATGM"...
And even if we gave it fantasy values (lets say 200 to circumvent frontal HEAT protection on a MBT) high-angle induced attacks would still be defeated by armour in a way it wouldn't against a TA attack...
Nope, I'd set it as TA nad continue to ***** for either a new weapon type (TA DW) or to let all TA weapons use the DW characteristic as per default (how many non-DW TA's are there out there?).
Quote:
JaM wrote
I think that all Top attack ATGMs are stated as multicharge in game
|
Quick check in the US OOB
TOW-2=top attack
TOW-2B=top attack
Javelin=top attack
So I'm thinking not really. 
__________________
"Med ett schysst järnrör slår man hela världen med häpnad!"
–Socker-Conny
|

September 5th, 2005, 10:11 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
obat66 Sweden
Hi all,
I have done a obat66 on sweden.
Corected lots of errors. It has also got the tgb-13 tgb-11, and so on.
There is also lots of new pictures to my obat, abot 200.
ok, there is still some errors in the obat.
if there some one who whant it contact me on:
niklas627@yahoo.se
cheers/
niklas
|

March 7th, 2006, 02:21 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 303
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: obat66 Sweden
TOW-2 should not be top-attack. Only TOW-2B.
|

September 6th, 2005, 04:15 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: obat66 Sweden
BILL-2 is also a top attack system, like BILL-1
The deferens is that the BILL-1 is gong 80cm above the "sight line" and have attack system which is directed 45' down. BILL-2 is flying 2m above the "sight line" and has got a multiple charge. The charges are directed ~90'.
More about the BILL-1 is that Bofors has shooting through 1m steel.
When I was at Kråksskjutfält we did shooting through a Strv-74. The hit was on the back of the tank, going through the engine and out on the bottom.
cheers
/niklas
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|