|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |

September 15th, 2005, 12:54 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Playtesting WinSPMBT patch
Ok it was just an oddity I've noticed before.
Another thing i've noticed is the AI's use of Airmobile units. When It by's them it tends to wait until it's very last turn then it come screaming forward and tries to get the V hexes.
I personaly have never seen it do an air assualt in the middle of a game.
|

September 15th, 2005, 02:03 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,998
Thanks: 492
Thanked 1,931 Times in 1,257 Posts
|
|
Re: Playtesting WinSPMBT patch
I have, several times. Near the objectives, or near the centre in a meeter, or in the rear (rarer) to overrun your gun line. As designed. As is the near the end attempt on objectives. Guard your rear
Cheers
Andy
|

September 15th, 2005, 11:56 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,015
Thanks: 143
Thanked 382 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Playtesting WinSPMBT patch
Quote:
Listy said:
I personaly have never seen it do an air assualt in the middle of a game.
|
I have, even in previous versions. And I like it, another justification for existance of the noble anti aircraft branch. 
|

September 15th, 2005, 03:35 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Playtesting WinSPMBT patch
Quote:
wulfir said:I have, even in previous versions. And I like it, another justification for existance of the noble anti aircraft branch.
|
Oh don't worry I always have some Cloud-punchers and Rock Apes about... but I've never had the AI pull one like that on me, so I figuered I should mention it.
I feel kinda deprived now. 
|

September 21st, 2005, 06:39 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,668
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Playtesting WinSPMBT patch
feedback from Scott Littleton <skotndiva@cox.net>
Hi Pyros,
Two scens have been effected by OOB changes it seems.
Scen 25: N Alliance T-54 SPA tanks have 107mm rockets and 130mm field
guns in weapon slots 2 and 3
Scen 39: Indian Centurion tanks have 30cal cmg in slot 1, 105mm L7 in slot 2
Actually, all the Indian tanks in Scen 39 are messed up, some have three
main tank guns in place of MGs.
Here's a couple more OOB screw ups:
Scen 21: US armor all messed up
Scen 22: Iraqi arty, SAMs, and some light armor are messed up.
Cheers
Scott
|

September 22nd, 2005, 05:25 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,687
Thanks: 4,119
Thanked 5,915 Times in 2,910 Posts
|
|
Re: Playtesting WinSPMBT patch
It is not possible to fix this for the patch without delaying the patch two weeks as I am leaving for a weeks vacation on Saturday. We have NO idea how this could have gotten this screwed up and I'll need to check the release verson and the CD release version to see if these errors are recent or old. I'm suspecting this may be an "old" problem
I had already considered releasing a "official" scenario package in a couple of months and if need be any corrections can go into that but we will check through the other scenarios and issue a mini patch on the forum if need be
Therefore, it would be helpful to have a bit nore detail about the problems than "some light armor are messed up" if that's possible
Don
|

September 22nd, 2005, 06:42 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,687
Thanks: 4,119
Thanked 5,915 Times in 2,910 Posts
|
|
Re: Playtesting WinSPMBT patch
OK we just discovered we DO have a big problem . This is not OOB related and it's not scenario related it's right in the EXE and how it's processing the info. We are debugging now and the patch release *IS* on hold
Don
|

September 23rd, 2005, 09:24 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,687
Thanks: 4,119
Thanked 5,915 Times in 2,910 Posts
|
|
Re: Playtesting WinSPMBT patch
Andy tells me the problems came from code which fixed weapons deleted on a unit in scenario editor, which some other code change had screwed up. This change buggered up some scenarios where the unit was marked as "changed" for some reason (the scenario designer had changed something not necessarily weapons and that's why some sceanrios were affected and others not. I'm testing this and so far it looks good . Good catch on Scotts part.
Don
|

September 23rd, 2005, 01:03 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Crossville, TN
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 21
Thanked 39 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
Re: Playtesting WinSPMBT patch
Quote:
DRG said:
OK we just discovered we DO have a big problem . This is not OOB related and it's not scenario related it's right in the EXE and how it's processing the info. We are debugging now and the patch release *IS* on hold
|
Can we maybe mention something to that effect in the public area of the forum? It appears a few of the natives are getting restless with at least 1 badmouthing Shrapnel. Bi#%@ing and moaning are 1 thing but making comments about Shrapnel or even Camo is another. 
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|