Re: OT: Recording Industry Ripoff
And yet... as long as they have those long lists of captive 'artists' they will be a problem. They can claim to be 'defending the rights of the artists' and request more changes to the law and more hardware hassle to 'protect' their artists even while everyone (including the artists) know very well that they are defending their own )(*$^(^@$ profits. Recording artists usually end up owing money to the music companies because they structure all the fees and business risks to protect themselves not the artists. They have little choice but to sign the contract that the company offers because almost all new artists start out relatively poor. Then the artists make their own profits (if any) on tour following the publicity generated by the album and (sometimes) promotion by the music company.
So, if more and more artists start to realize they can just release tracks on P2P to 'promote' their tours and they don't need the exploting music companies then the end will truly be near for the suits. That is what they are afraid of, even more than the immediate losses of piracy of some of the works of their currently contracted artists. They are terrified that a new kind of music business could grow up that they aren't even part of and when the contracts run out, the artists just walk away...
|
Threaded Mode