Fighters! What are they good for?

tesco samoa · #1 September 29th, 2001, 04:16 AM

ahh but fighters are cheap to build and require no maintence.

All comes down to balance. Fighters can tip the scale in a battle.

Now if you actually controlled combat fighters value jumps 100 fold.

I use them. A fleet without them can be destroyed quickly.

Jump an enemy with 3000 fighters and see what survives.

------------------
Inter arma silent leges

Deathstalker · #2 September 29th, 2001, 04:53 AM

anyone tried the trick with the Heavy Carrier and the shipyard anymore?? (I think it was with a hvy carrier, ship space yard and fighters with kamikaze warheads....use them like 'missiles', use the carrier to build more after each battle)....Tried it a few patches ago, worked ok...Never tried it in strategic combat though...

I also love to build Starbases on wormholes with lots of fighters/launchbays onboard, this works good for planets too, use bases with cargo bays/launch bays to suppliment the planet space (or to leave planet space for those 1 armor riot troops....)

------------------
"We are all...the sum of our scars"....(paraphrased) Matt. R. Stover-'Blade of Tyshalle'.

"Human existance is all imagination...Reality is no more than a simple agreement among its participants that this is where we shall meet, and these are the rules that we shall abide by."- Kevin McCarthy/David Silva "The Family:Special Effects"..

[This message has been edited by Deathstalker (edited 29 September 2001).]

Askan Nightbringer · #3 September 29th, 2001, 04:55 AM

Actually I think fighters could be made alot better if the range of point defence was alot less (like 1 or 2 or something) or alternatively the fighter's weapon ranges were much greater (like 5 or 6)

Then they could get a shot of before the point defence hit.

Askan

Deathstalker · #4 September 29th, 2001, 04:57 AM

I think that point defense is TOO powerful, I believe that missile rof should be 2, (maybe 1 for crystal torp, too low damage), and pdc should have a rate of fire of 2....but heck that is just me...

fishnetPA · #5 September 29th, 2001, 06:35 PM

There is one minor fighter bug that I have used to get around the limitation of not being able to launch a fighter from a planet and being able to move it in the same turn.
The trick is to launch a fighter the previous turn (only need one), if you did this, then the fighters you launch the current turn CAN move the turn they launch!

CW · #6 September 29th, 2001, 07:18 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Deathstalker:
anyone tried the trick with the Heavy Carrier and the shipyard anymore?? (I think it was with a hvy carrier, ship space yard and fighters with kamikaze warheads....use them like 'missiles', use the carrier to build more after each battle)....Tried it a few patches ago, worked ok...Never tried it in strategic combat though...

Can your space yard sustain the losses? I really doubt it...

On to the topic of missiles, I just discovered why everyone likes seeking parasites. I figured out that I could design a mean-and-nasty DN that a homeworld can build in TWO (!!) turns at the normal rate of 4800!

raynor · #7 October 1st, 2001, 06:47 AM

When I played more, I would group my fighters in Groups of 80 and put them in the fleet with my other ships before I attacked. I found that small fighters with the most primitive weapon seemed to survive better that way against the PDC than when I launched them from a carrier.

I think the best thing about fighters is that they don't affect your score. So, you can build a huge maintenance-free armada of fighters at every colony and not have to worry about becoming Mega Evil Empire before you are ready to start annihilating everyone in sight.