|
|
|
 |

November 25th, 2005, 07:45 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Montpellier, France
Posts: 208
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: OT, what games r u wating 4 now?
Quote:
izaqyos said:
I have noticed that a lot of people are not excited with HOMM V. I wonder why.
|
- It seems that priority has been granted to nice looking 3d graphics than to innovative gameplay.
- Units in former HOMM seemed to be a big melting pot, but it had it's own personality. Now nival has imo turned it to noname standard fantasy.
- Starforce protection  .
|

November 25th, 2005, 05:27 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: OT, what games r u wating 4 now?
Quote:
Olive said:
Quote:
izaqyos said:
I have noticed that a lot of people are not excited with HOMM V. I wonder why.
|
- It seems that priority has been granted to nice looking 3d graphics than to innovative gameplay.
|
Exactly from what I've been reading and seeing... they're not trying to make smarter AI, better balance, more unique structures, more monsters, etc., . Instead of adding improved content they're focusing on how pretty stuff looks.
On the same note... who's going to by the newest and best looking sportscar when it gets half the horsepower, no A/C, no radio or DVD player, thin tires, and less gas mileage. That's what I've seen happen with game sequels way too often.
__________________
There can be only one.
|

November 25th, 2005, 07:05 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,449
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: OT, what games r u wating 4 now?
Quote:
NTJedi said:
Exactly from what I've been reading and seeing... they're not trying to make smarter AI, better balance, more unique structures, more monsters, etc., . Instead of adding improved content they're focusing on how pretty stuff looks. 
On the same note... who's going to by the newest and best looking sportscar when it gets half the horsepower, no A/C, no radio or DVD player, thin tires, and less gas mileage. That's what I've seen happen with game sequels way too often.
|
And who can blame them?
Check out the HoMM Community, everyone there idolizes the 3rd game as the ultimate game (in the series, and in general). I think its quite obvious to Ubisoft the best way to please its fanbase is with a game that is "True to its origins".
Also, you have to remember its their first game in the series, they just recently purchased the rights to HoMM, and therefore would probably want to take minimal risks and make minimal changes on its very first realese, a game which will leave a "first impression" on all future games on the series.
__________________
I'm in the IDF. (So any new reply by me is a very rare event.)
|

November 28th, 2005, 06:55 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: OT, what games r u wating 4 now?
Quote:
Agrajag said:
[And who can blame them?
Check out the HoMM Community, everyone there idolizes the 3rd game as the ultimate game (in the series, and in general). I think its quite obvious to Ubisoft the best way to please its fanbase is with a game that is "True to its origins".
Also, you have to remember its their first game in the series, they just recently purchased the rights to HoMM, and therefore would probably want to take minimal risks and make minimal changes on its very first realese, a game which will leave a "first impression" on all future games on the series.
|
They don't have to make major changes, but usually when the developers focus on making stuff more pretty they begin removing or not working other stuff like what happened in Heroes_4. Heroes_4 was very unbalanced, less monsters, no unique heroes, etc, etc,... all it had was better graphics. If they make Heroes_5 the same as Heroes_3 it will be great as long as they have AT_LEAST as many movement squares on battle_maps, movement squares for world_map, monsters, items, town_types, unique heroes, and map_editor features... also game balance. All this is not really much to ask for since it previously existed in Heroes_3.
__________________
There can be only one.
|

November 28th, 2005, 09:17 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 822
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT, what games r u wating 4 now?
The Fool and his Money has an impressive legacy to live up to... If it's as good as The Fool's Errand was, it should be great.
http://www.fools-errand.com/05-the-fool-and-his-money/
|

December 5th, 2005, 03:21 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 165
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT, what games r u wating 4 now?
My current wait list isn't particularly long.
Dom 3 (the happiest expectation on the list, of course).
Civ 4 (technically, I'm waiting for a chance to read an in-depth review of the finished product before springing for this. Likely to be my next actual buy if the reviews are good, but I'm not jumping on it. I liked Civ 3 far less than Civ 2.)
Sim Golf 2 (not a chance--about 1% on the "which old game to redo" poll at Firaxis.) web page
Colonization 2 (second place in the "which old game to redo" poll at Firaxis, at 31%.)
Master of Orion 4 (given what happened to MOO3, not likely any time soon--I really hope MOO3 has not sunk the frachise.)
Xenocide (current fan development of the classic game, UFO Defense, total vaporware for the forseeable future, IMO.) web page
Skaven mod for Civ3 (currently under development on CivFanatic site). web page
Actually, I haven't been doing a lot of looking recently, and own far more computer games than I have mastered.
I'm still looking for a more satisfying 4x space game than anything I've seen so far (MOO2 without the 7th inning stretch would be an ideal starting point, IMO. I like elements of Space Gold IV, but some of the micromanagement busywork drives me up the wall. Also, I find that universe not immersive enough; MOO2, Star Trek, Babylon 5, and Star Wars are all much more so; but all five, plus Reach for the Stars, beat Galactic Civ by a wide margin on this count.)
|

December 6th, 2005, 06:04 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT, what games r u wating 4 now?
Quote:
RedRover said:
Civ 4 (technically, I'm waiting for a chance to read an in-depth review of the finished product before springing for this. Likely to be my next actual buy if the reviews are good, but I'm not jumping on it. I liked Civ 3 far less than Civ 2.)
|
Played it. Going to buy it soon. Seems a mite better than its predecessors, with more multiplayer goodness. Minor improvements, a few even less significant design mistakes, good stuff.
Quote:
Colonization 2 (second place in the "which old game to redo" poll at Firaxis, at 31%.)
|
Pshaw. Stardock had a poll like this, and I don't see them making Master of Magic 2. Nor even a proper StarCon III.
Quote:
Master of Orion 4 (given what happened to MOO3, not likely any time soon--I really hope MOO3 has not sunk the frachise.)
|
Oh, it's sunk. And none have shed more tears than I.
Quote:
Xenocide (current fan development of the classic game, UFO Defense, total vaporware for the forseeable future, IMO.) web page
|
You pretty much said it. You're waiting for a lot of games that aren't going to happen, ain'tcha? Can't say I don't sympathize. X-Com was right up there with MoM, MoO, and StarCon II.
Quote:
Skaven mod for Civ3 (currently under development on CivFanatic site). web page
|
Heard of Mark of Chaos? The gaming industry being what it is, I imagine it'll turn about to be just another mindless, soulless by-the-number RTS. Then again, there's always the possiblity of another Dark Omen or, better yet, Shadow of the Horned Rat. Worst case scenario, those are some high-res stormvermin, aren't they? Gotta love the skaven.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|