|
|
|
 |

January 12th, 2006, 10:59 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Balanced System Mod - 2.0
Maybe the stock deployment doesn't use an existing planet. Maybe it always creates another one. For example, that's what it HAS to do if one edits a map and clicks on a sector to tell the game where a starting point is. When I set those maps up, I always clicked a blank sector.
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

January 12th, 2006, 11:18 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Balanced System Mod - 2.0
If you put a starting point in a blank sector in the map editor it will create a planet. It will also create one if it can't find a suitable size and atmosphere, as in the case a lot of times if you do a good planet start, especially a multi planet start. But there are cases where it will use an exsisting planet. I'm just not sure of all the logic it goes through to make the decision.
There are also cases where it will change the atmosphere of an existing planet to use it as a homeworld. For example if you place a starting point in a sector that has a planet, but of the wrong atmosphere.
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

January 12th, 2006, 03:21 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Balanced System Mod - 2.0
Sounds like the stock "homeworld placement routine" is a bit more detailed than what you can do in a mod, then. Of course, what do I know, anyway?
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

January 12th, 2006, 03:54 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Balanced System Mod - 2.0
Quote:
Slynky said:
Sounds like the stock "homeworld placement routine" is a bit more detailed than what you can do in a mod, then.
|
This is not moddable in any way. All modders can do is change the stuff on the map, but not how SE4 routines use it.
The solution is to either only have moons orbiting huge (or tiny) planets, or to mark systems with moons orbitting large, medium or small planets as not allowed for home systems.
|

January 12th, 2006, 03:59 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Balanced System Mod - 2.0
Ooooo. That makes perfect sense. Somehow I never noticed that all moons in stock orbited huge planets. duh 
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

January 12th, 2006, 04:30 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Balanced System Mod - 2.0
Quote:
geoschmo said:
Ooooo. That makes perfect sense. Somehow I never noticed that all moons in stock orbited huge planets. duh
|
Might as well form a line... I never noticed that detail, either.
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|