|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |

January 18th, 2006, 05:31 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 354
Thanks: 351
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Improvements you want to WinSPMBT
Well, I heard of ATF and it looks really nice. But it dosen't have what WinSPMBT has, mainly the ability to play almost any battle in recent history and a good representation of morale. FPS aren't really true "simulators" because soldiers (the video game players) are always fearless. For example, if everyone playing Battlefield 1942 fought on the real battlefield like they did in the game, they'd all get medals of honor. There's no way to reflect supression or morale, although they can be very realistic otherwise.
Has anyone played Jane's Fleet Command? Someone needs to build a game like that for land combat, with cool 3D visuals and a huge battlefield.
|

January 18th, 2006, 09:35 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Improvements you want to WinSPMBT
What is needed is a game like Combat Mission but with graphics that aren't from the mid-80s and that doesn't work in turns but rather is real-time with a pause button. Oh, and better objects/maps that include buildings, etc.
I know it can be done. I think the perception is that the market for such games is just too thin.
|

January 20th, 2006, 11:13 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 354
Thanks: 351
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Improvements you want to WinSPMBT
That's right, Pepper. Everyone likes these crazy RTS games like C&C Generals (the old ones were good, the new one sucks). People put a huge ammount of work into FPS and RTS, but they should think of putting just a little into a good combat sim. I'm sure it would pay off for them, because any serious effort by a big company to make a combat sim would dominate the small market.
|

January 20th, 2006, 12:33 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Crossville, TN
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 21
Thanked 39 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
Re: Improvements you want to WinSPMBT
I'd like to see something along the lines of the CM 3D model BUT with WinSPMBT's depth of OOB's. I could even go for the WE-GO type system CM uses.
|

January 20th, 2006, 02:24 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Budapest
Posts: 403
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Improvements you want to WinSPMBT
Well, would like to see the worst phenomenon corrected one day  ,
http://www.shrapnelcommunity.com/thr...b=5&o=&fpart=1
Artur.
__________________
"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.", Sun Tzu
|

January 21st, 2006, 12:48 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 354
Thanks: 351
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Improvements you want to WinSPMBT
That definetly would be a big improvement. I don't know C, but I'm sure you or someone you know does. Why don't you ask them to make a mod, and maybe Shrapnel will include it in the next patch?
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|