|
|
|
 |
|

February 6th, 2006, 06:20 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Question for next balance mod.
I think that's the theory but I don't think it quite makes up for it .. 120 points is A LOT. Especially when you look at Abysia and Jotun's national troops, which while expensive are pretty effective.
|

February 6th, 2006, 06:28 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question for next balance mod.
Well just try those races in multiplayer. If they are so good with the free picks, they should be picked first most often. Oddly enough that is rarely the case  .
|

February 6th, 2006, 06:36 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Question for next balance mod.
Well in all the games I've played, Jotun seems pretyt popular. =)
|

February 6th, 2006, 06:43 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Question for next balance mod.
Well by giving some races bigger advantages it allows more variation when going against AI or human opponents.
For example if an experienced player wants to introduce a rookie to the game most likely the rookie will be suggested to take Ermor. And the experienced gamer would play one of the weaker races and a weaker pretender. As a result a good game can be played... if all the races are equal then the only way a veteran could easily introduce a rookie would be by editing the .map file or installing a mod.
__________________
There can be only one.
|

February 6th, 2006, 06:49 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Question for next balance mod.
I'm not so sure about that ... since the experienced player can just not use all his points to handicap himself. =)
|

February 6th, 2006, 06:57 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Question for next balance mod.
Quote:
KissBlade said:
I'm not so sure about that ... since the experienced player can just not use all his points to handicap himself. =)
|
Exactly the same reponse for your original post. If the experienced player views Ermor has having too many points he simply can just not use all his points to handicap himself. 
__________________
There can be only one.
|

February 6th, 2006, 07:01 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question for next balance mod.
Quote:
I'm speaking of races such as Caelum, Jotunheim, C'tis, Abysia and even Ermor to some extent
|
What nations are you comparing to? Pythium, Arco, R'lyeh, etc.? They all have rather effective troops.
|

February 6th, 2006, 07:08 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Question for next balance mod.
Temperature scale isn't all good. Every pick the temperature differs from your nation's preferred, you lose income, resources and supplies. Unless you have strong dominion, seasons effect this. Unless your dominions spreads very fast, you'll have to preach in conquered provinces before they are in your preferred temperature, and then wait until they catch up with the warmth.
The nations that need spesific temperature need high dominion, possibly with a special theme improving dominion /temperature spread.
Also, some nations require less resources. E.g. Mictlan can survive with Sloth 2 or 3 AND use its many national units (mainly Jaguar Warriors, of course). Jotunheim can't, especially not Niefelheim. Pythium starts with 7 gems, and has free communion slaves. The thing is, many of the nations have something special, something that makes them worth it.
It's also often the case of how you play, as well. I don't remember how Gandalf used to say it, but the nations are just tools which the player must use. A player must choose a correct tool for a spesific strategy, and e.g. Pangaea can be deadly stealth nation. Gandalf has these wonderful stories of Pangaea scouting provinces with the Black Harpies, then conquering a province via Call of the Wild with (possibly) some stealth support, then building a castle, lab, temple with the stealthy commanders - and when your enemy finds your "capital", he'll be very confused!
EDIT: you don't recruit provinces...
|

February 6th, 2006, 08:40 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Question for next balance mod.
Oh I didn't realize that about the temperature scale. At first I literally thought there was no downside to taking those points.
|

February 6th, 2006, 09:04 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 161
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question for next balance mod.
also, i've found, that if you feel taht way, then just don't take the races you think have a disadvantage. the vets will gladly take them and whoop you with them.
for example, i find undead very weak, because they just get banished away by the groups. i know it's not the case, especially with soulgate's MR, but i still feel that way, so i dont' play undead races, generally.
__________________
I will take you there.
<font color="orange">???</font> - God of <font color="orange">???</font> in RAND2
<font color="purple">Helios</font> - God of <font color="red">Marignon</font> in The Animal Kingdom
<font color="white">Senator Jargramar</font> - God of <font color="blue">R'lyeh</font> in The Senate of Dragons
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|