Clash Of Armies [Started]

[The Panther]

Oh, and one other thing. You need a victory condition of some sort.

[Reverend Zombie]

I'd like to give Pythium a whirl here.

[OG_Gleep]

I'll take Van if theres still room.

[Oversway]

I'd like to try Rlyeh. If you don't want sea nations, I will pick Pan

[RonD]

I kind of like the idea of banning blood hunting (given what you want to accomplish, anyway).

That said, I will withdraw my choice of Marignon, and switch to Atlantis.

Here's one more thing to ponder: I am currently playing in a 6-player small map game with 25% sites and a rich world. The low sites setting gives a huge advantage to the owner of a gem-producing global. With 5 remaining players in that game, at least its somewhat a matter of choice whether to put one up or not. With 17 players, it could be mostly a race to get the 3 or 4 really useful gem spells. Would it be worth banning those, also?

And, one last bit - I agree with Panther about needing a VP or province-based victory condition.

[Cainehill]

True - Man or Pangaea could easily rush for Alt-5 for Mother Oak, giving them a big leg up compared to other nations. ( In 56 turns, with a N4 pretender searching 25 provinces, zero nature sites found. )

[Peacekeeper]

i would like to take up the cause of the Tien Chi

[Wish]

I'll come in as machaka

[shovah]

and blind everyones armies! i hope machaka wins

[The Panther]

Hey, I am really liking these settings with the blood ban!

However, my original choice of Abysia is now unplayable. I will therefore switch to C'tis.

Since I may be snowed-in in Nashville on my way east, I should have plenty of time to work out a super-duper Pretender!