|
|
|
 |

February 28th, 2006, 10:20 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 418
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Segmentation Fault since Debian unstable upgra
You are so comforting, Alneyan :-D
__________________
There are roads which must not be followed, towns which must not be besieged, positions which must not be contested, commands of the sovereign which must not be obeyed. (Sun Tsu "The Art of War", ca. 500 BC)
|

February 28th, 2006, 10:48 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Segmentation Fault since Debian unstable upgra
I've got the same issue. It looks like the problem is in libSDL-1.2.so.0, since thats the only one that changed between Sunday and Monday. There's no bug report against it yet, and a quick look at the package overview doesn't show anything obvious. I may try to downgrade it to the testing version and see what that breaks...
Meanwhile I can do my turns on my old slow laptop, which is I guess better than nothing.
|

February 28th, 2006, 10:06 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Segmentation Fault since Debian unstable upgra
I got it working again. Downloaded the libsdl1.2debian-oss package from testing and installed it. Hasn't seemed to break anything else.
I got it from
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/ma...9-0.1_i386.deb
It'll probably break again next time I upgrade, but I'll just keep the .deb around and reinstall as necessary.
|

March 1st, 2006, 11:04 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 418
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Segmentation Fault since Debian unstable upgra
Yup, worked for me as well. It is really strange as it is only a repackage of the same library version. Have got no clue what changed.
Well - hope that one or the other side will eventually fix that incompatibility and I am able to upgrade my OS the normal way again.
BTW: It is always possible to set a package on 'hold' to prevent it from being updated by 'apt-get upgrade'. I just have to find out again how it is done ... 
__________________
There are roads which must not be followed, towns which must not be besieged, positions which must not be contested, commands of the sovereign which must not be obeyed. (Sun Tsu "The Art of War", ca. 500 BC)
|

March 1st, 2006, 11:27 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Segmentation Fault since Debian unstable upgra
I'm pretty sure aptitude allows to set packages on hold, either through its interface (a bit clumsy for my tastes), or via a command (aptitude hold package_name ; unhold to remove the hold).
There should be other ways around the problem, of course (dpkg or dselect). Then again, it's not as if I update packages *that* often, being on stable and all. 
|

March 1st, 2006, 08:42 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Segmentation Fault since Debian unstable upgra
I've done the 'hold' thing before, and I'd have to go figure it out again...
Except, I updated again this morning and had to do an apt-get -f install to fix the dependcy problems I'd created. apt wanted to install libsdl1.2debian-alsa, so I let it and that seems to work fine.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|