|
|
|
|
 |
March 9th, 2006, 06:21 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy
Quote:
archaeolept said:
lol - how is what QM and IH done not a "meta-strategy"?
|
No, its not. What IH has done is to work diplomatically for the win from turn 1. And now you see your chance for victory disappearing because all my diplomatic work has paid off. Well, I am sorry that all your hard work has been in vain, arch. But the truth is that the game developed into a King Maker situation and I beat you to it. Fair and square. You lose. If you cannot see that through your own self-righteousness then that is your problem.
But - you are in luck! I have grown tired of pandering to your ridiculous collusion arguments and decided to bow out of this game. Enjoy your victory!!! Big time congrats on the win!!!! |
March 10th, 2006, 12:20 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy
lol pandering. I've had to endure your sputtering B.S., self-serving distortions, and outright lies all game - fine, if you can't deal w/ looking for a fair ie. interesting fight. But no way in hell does my strategy have to follow how you would want it to be. Clearly, w/ quantum acting as if he were sworn to subservience, the best way to break your "unholy alliance" is to offer quantum enough to tempt him into going solely for the win - ie. by leaving my territories undefended. Then the possibility remains that, following a great armageddon war, i might be able to squeak up the middle, however unlikely that may be.
That's why you want to bow out - the threat of actually having to fight for something after all. I haven't withdrawn - feel free to win if you can.
|
March 10th, 2006, 02:30 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy
I can't believe you are so sore because I stole the win from you via diplomacy. Why can't you see how poor of a sport you're being?
|
March 10th, 2006, 02:35 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Diplomacy
what the [censored] - i'm pissed at the [censored] you've spewed all game towards me. I already offered to decline any win earlier in discussion w/ quant, if he were willing to not throw the game to you. I don't give a [censored] about winning; i do give a [censored] about playing well, and playing fair, and not having to listen to your crap.
|
March 10th, 2006, 04:16 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Enough
Ok, we all know I'm not a mod, but perhaps it would be best to end this thread here.
|
March 10th, 2006, 11:51 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Enough
And possibly the game as well, all things considered.
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
