|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|

August 21st, 2006, 05:33 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,415
Thanks: 103
Thanked 649 Times in 433 Posts
|
|
Re: US Army OOB
Anyway, it will be interesting to see US Army employment of guided artillery in the next version of MBT; you'll have artillery with unpreceedented accuracy, and the targeted Hex will become known as the "hex of death"
|

August 21st, 2006, 06:03 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: US Army OOB
Quote:
MarkSheppard said:
Anyway, it will be interesting to see US Army employment of guided artillery in the next version of MBT; you'll have artillery with unpreceedented accuracy, and the targeted Hex will become known as the "hex of death"
|
Are you saying that it will be possible to simulate the various Excalibur,Copperhead, Smel'chak and Krasnopol in the next SPMBT release?
|

August 21st, 2006, 08:02 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 263
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: US Army OOB
It is possible now... Just make TOP Attack ATGM with HE warhead with stats of Copperhead and give it to FIST-V and FO units. Same effect with minimal chnges to the code...
|

August 21st, 2006, 10:05 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,415
Thanks: 103
Thanked 649 Times in 433 Posts
|
|
Re: US Army OOB
Are you saying that it will be possible to simulate the various Excalibur,Copperhead, Smel'chak and Krasnopol in the next SPMBT release?
Well, Take US Weapon Slot 76
155mm M777 VT
It's got an accuracy of 10
Simply copy and paste it into a blank slot and rename it to
155mm GPS Guided
and give it an accuracy of 93 (Same as 1000 lb JDAM)
There are only about 15 weapons slots free in the US OOB though...so it's entirely possible that SPCAMO will decide to condense as many of the "guided" artillery shells into a single round for each major calibre; like 155mm Guided, 105mm Guided, etc.
|

August 21st, 2006, 10:15 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 263
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: US Army OOB
ATGM metod would be better, because you always fire a copperhead to a target, one M109 fire one Copperhead, but with 155mmGPS guided gun for M109 you will always fire 4-5 shots in one salvo...
|

August 21st, 2006, 10:28 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,415
Thanks: 103
Thanked 649 Times in 433 Posts
|
|
Re: US Army OOB
Hmm. That's because Copperhead's laser-guided; but with GPS guidance, you can just keep firing them and achieve a high bracket barrage.
|

August 21st, 2006, 10:29 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,998
Thanks: 492
Thanked 1,931 Times in 1,257 Posts
|
|
Re: US Army OOB
Hmm - and the accuracy figure is only relevant to the weapon firing in direct fire over open sights. The acc figure for arty weapons is used when an SP mount or field gun is firing direct fire with that weapon.
To simulate laser-designated rounds in SP the ATGM route is probably best (if the observer moves, he tends to lose his shot - so needs to stay still to lase target/ set up the designation kit etc) . It is not ideal, but there is no way to simulate a desigator/missile pairing any other way really. Not without a new game engine.
Cheers
Andy
|

August 22nd, 2006, 02:36 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,415
Thanks: 103
Thanked 649 Times in 433 Posts
|
|
Re: US Army OOB
It is not ideal, but there is no way to simulate a desigator/missile pairing any other way really. Not without a new game engine.
What about GPS guided rounds? They don't need a designator pairing, you just radio off a string of target co-ordinates over the radio like you would with normal artillery, the only difference is that the shells coming downrange are really really accurate.
I think it could be represented by creating another weapon class which uses the accuracy rating for both direct and indirect fire to represent Excalibur or GMRLS.
--------
Linka
Summarized
Maybe a third of the guns and rocket launchers [In Iraq] are actually put to work.
...
The MLRS has been particularly popular for the last six months, since the new GPS guided rocket became available.
This fall, a GPS guided 155mm shell (the Excalibur) will enter service, giving the M-109s more to do. In most operations, unguided 155mm shells are too inaccurate to use because the fighting is in urban areas. The Excalibur is a different story. The MLRS launchers have used so many GPS guided rockets that these new items are in very short supply, and are rationed.
On the down side, the GPS guided shells and rockets mean that much fewer shells and rockets are needed. It's pretty much, "one target, one shell." With these "smart shells," the number of rounds needed will decline by over 90 percent.
|

August 22nd, 2006, 12:22 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,998
Thanks: 492
Thanked 1,931 Times in 1,257 Posts
|
|
Re: US Army OOB
It may be better to approach this as a special data item for FOO units (FC or RF or EW maybe with a special code, or a new data item) which brings super-accurate fire IF the target is in LOS of the FOO, for maybe an added 500 points per such an FOO?.
I will look into this, and see if something can be done.
Cheers
Andy
|

August 22nd, 2006, 01:20 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: US Army OOB
Quote:
Mobhack said:
It may be better to approach this as a special data item for FOO units (FC or RF or EW maybe with a special code, or a new data item) which brings super-accurate fire IF the target is in LOS of the FOO, for maybe an added 500 points per such an FOO?.
I will look into this, and see if something can be done.
Cheers
Andy
|
Personally I would consider good enough just any solution (a separate artillery class,anything) which could make the shells fall within the designated target hex, without dispersion except eventually for occasional malfunctions and such.
Anything more than that would be a bonus,of course.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|