|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |

November 4th, 2006, 11:24 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 801
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: I Have to get one of these!
Isn't that the role that was previously filled by the Milkor MGL-MK1? Is this thing designed to replace that weapon? It does seem like it was designed with a similar role in mind.
|

November 5th, 2006, 09:00 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London (Great Britain)
Posts: 852
Thanks: 207
Thanked 176 Times in 97 Posts
|
|
Re: I Have to get one of these!
My point is that this weapon represents this sort of fuzzy logic which I think is dangerous.
__________________
"Wir Deutschen sollten die Wahrheit auch dann ertragen lernen, wenn sie für uns günstig ist."
|

November 5th, 2006, 03:47 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,991
Thanks: 487
Thanked 1,926 Times in 1,253 Posts
|
|
Re: I Have to get one of these!
hmm - lots of weight for a specialist role that does not come up that often?.
i dont see anything in that thing that could justify the weight penalty - best to use that weight allowance for a few bullet-trap rifle grenades and/or disposable LAWS. (Apparently the 66mm M72 LAW is making a comeback as it is light, handy and efective for tasks not involving the killing of modern MBT).
Cheers
Andy
|

November 5th, 2006, 04:26 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 801
Thanks: 3
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: I Have to get one of these!
Yes, and its odd, because both the M72A7 and the M32 grenade launcher (Milkor MGL-140 IIRC) have been brought back by the USMC primarily (though the Army has also reissued the M72 on a very limited basis), who realize the need for such weapons, especially in an urban enviornment. This is all while the US Army is in the process of developing the XM25, which is very close to the South African weapon described here. I never understood why rifle grenades were not more popular.
They give the additional range desired, better terminal effects often, and don't require a specialist weapon, often at a far cheaper rate than developing on of these things.
|

November 5th, 2006, 05:46 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,991
Thanks: 487
Thanked 1,926 Times in 1,253 Posts
|
|
Re: I Have to get one of these!
maybe an institutional memory of the problems of having to fiddle about with blank rounds for firing r/gren, and not having troos use a live round by mistake?.
Bullet trap R/gren have been around since the mid 70s, for 5.56mm anyway, but it took the UK army till the late 90s to introduce RGGS. However this will now be replaced with the L17 UGL (40mm H&K) - which will also (possibly?) replace the 51mm platoon mortars. I think the UGL has the advantage of accuracy at the longer ranges, but primarily it has a round ready to go that is not interfering with the proper use of the rifle.
But neither really replace a section individual weapon, like the 20mm thingy would have to.
Andy
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|