|
|
|
 |

November 5th, 2006, 11:40 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, ME (USA)
Posts: 3,241
Thanks: 31
Thanked 65 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Patch
I am of the view that it might add some spicy fun to patch and have a few horrors crash the party for a bit... until the next fix.
Any player strongly against patching?
|

November 6th, 2006, 12:50 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Patch
Quote:
PashaDawg said:
I am of the view that it might add some spicy fun to patch and have a few horrors crash the party for a bit... until the next fix.
Any player strongly against patching?
|
Yes, simply because it's one of the patches that introduced more, bigger, problems than it fixed.
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|

November 6th, 2006, 09:31 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 790
Thanks: 7
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Patch
To prevent people crying and stop playing because their pretender dies in a horror attack in turn 2 i would prefer a start without the patch.
But here we've the problem that i'm not sure that all players could install a second 3.0 Version of the game.
An illwinter coment about a hotfix would be very good!
EDIT: wrong thread but possible same problem 
|

November 6th, 2006, 09:52 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, ME (USA)
Posts: 3,241
Thanks: 31
Thanked 65 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Patch
I have received all turns for turn 16, but I am going to delay hosting until Tuesday to give more time to discuss whether to patch or not patch. Players seem to be nearly equally split.
Some players would get fixes with the patch. Others are concerned that it creates more problems.
|

November 6th, 2006, 01:29 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bavaria , Germany
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Patch
I am indifferent.
3.00 or 3.01, i am fine with both.
|

November 6th, 2006, 03:08 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, ME (USA)
Posts: 3,241
Thanks: 31
Thanked 65 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Patch
Ugh! Now, I am coming around to thinking it would be best to NOT use the patch. I know that is very inconvenient for some players. However, it sounds like the horror-bug could seriously frustrate players and spoil the fun.
I know that some players would benefit from the patch's fixes, but I think it is more appropriate to stay with the current "broken" game rather than introduce new problems.
|

November 6th, 2006, 03:20 PM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Patch
Well ive already patched aswell (several days ago) so i would prefer to either play with the patch or just wait until there is a fix for the horror bug (however small the fix maybe, just reducing the frequency might help) but in the end, its not up to me.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|