|
|
|
 |

November 18th, 2006, 08:24 AM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Maybe there isn\'t a limit of three random even
Im guessing by almost always takes misfortune you meant turmoil?
|

November 18th, 2006, 08:38 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Maybe there isn\'t a limit of three random even
Quote:
Shovah32 said:
Im guessing by almost always takes misfortune you meant turmoil?
|
Yes. I'll edit the post.
|

November 18th, 2006, 09:28 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Gdansk, Poland
Posts: 420
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Maybe there isn\'t a limit of three random even
Aww, I have a feeling it's pretender causing extra events here. But at least pretender events aren't limited by the cap.
__________________
Those who do not understand Master Of Magic are condemned to reinvent it - badly.
|

November 18th, 2006, 09:51 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Maybe there isn\'t a limit of three random even
I have played turmoil 3/luck 3 in several games. My experience is that there is a cap of 3 random events but there r exceptions which can cause this limit to be broken.
The most I have ever seen is 5 in one turn.
The exceptions AFAIK r if u conquer another players/indie province, I believe u can get there random event. Also spells that cause random events (usually bad) that r being cast at u. There could well be other in game happenings which result in more than 3 random events, but 3 is definately a basic cap.
|

November 18th, 2006, 02:47 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bordeaux, France
Posts: 794
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Maybe there isn\'t a limit of three random even
Meglobob, could you please make a small effort when typing? typing "r" for "are", or "u" for "you", only saves you two keystrokes, and makes your posts much, much more annoying to read. Also, please remember that a non-trivial proportion of readers here are NOT native English speakers, and this makes it even harder for them (us).
|

November 18th, 2006, 03:50 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,050
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Maybe there isn\'t a limit of three random even
Yeah, I also think that "are" instead of "r" is much better.
__________________
Great indebtedness does not make men grateful, but vengeful; and if a little charity is not forgotten, it turns into a gnawing worm.
|

November 18th, 2006, 08:31 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 596
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Maybe there isn\'t a limit of three random even
I just never bother to read posts where the author doesn't attempt to type correctly.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|