|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				December 1st, 2006, 10:37 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: athens, georgia 
						Posts: 274
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI concept of the \'80ies ... why? 
 HoneyBadger, I think I said something similar.  Maybe what I wrote was invisible though, as nobody has acknowledged it.  I will go back to the AS thread and angrily sulk there.
 In any case, Total Annihilations had a very interesting AI MOD model.  It was a text file of units and weights, different for each race, and different for different types of maps, and completely changeable by the player.  E.g.  if we were to have this kind of possibility in Dom III, we could have a text file (or xml) that allowed us to say something like (this is simplified):
 
 race 43 (superbadgers)
 pretendertype;SC,Magic,Lucky,Random
 turns0--24;StratMagicTurtle (slow expansion)
 turns0--24;regunit456;30%  (badger militia)
 turns0--24;regunit457;70%  (h inf badgers)
 turns0--24;cmdrunit466;90% (badger mage scholars)
 turns0--24;cmdrunit465;10% (reg commander)
 turns25--48;StratMagicDragon (rapid expansion)
 turns25--48;regunit458;50%  (sacred badger unit)
 turns25--48;regunit459;50%   (badgersamurai)
 turns25--48;cmdrunit459;90%  (badger battle mage)
 turns25--48;cmdrunit460;10%  (badger priest of light)
 .
 .
 .
 etc.
 
				__________________--Uh-Nu-Buh, Fire/Death
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				December 2nd, 2006, 01:33 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2003 
						Posts: 404
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI concept of the \'80ies ... why? 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Uh-Nu-Buh said: In any case, Total Annihilations had a very interesting AI MOD model.  It was a text file of units and weights, different for each race, and different for different types of maps, and completely changeable by the player.
 
 |  It's a long step from a fully customizable AI, but could still mean great improvements for dominions.
 
Semi-related: is there a way to set a 'difficult' AI when changing from human to AI, for example to set up a single player challenge? Would be potentially bad for multiplay though. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				December 2nd, 2006, 10:35 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2003 
						Posts: 262
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI concept of the \'80ies ... why? 
 Once upon a time I was playing Wesnoth as the Undead.  My leading troops were ghosts with a chill attack.  After driving the Imperials back most of the map I noticed he had started recruiting mermen.  I thought that was odd since Mermen aren't   that good on land and there wasn't much water then I realized they were strongly resistant to cold damage.  The AI was paying attention to what I was doing!  I felt so validated as a person! ;-) I also thought he should be recruiting mages that could actually hurt my ghosts instead. :-( |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				December 4th, 2006, 10:54 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Budapest, Hungary 
						Posts: 1,221
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI concept of the \'80ies ... why? 
 I agree with Arralen. In fact imo we will see very good AIs in a couple of years, when most of the players will have a decent PC to run the AI processes fast enough. 
Right now, many people have some low end machines still, running complicated AI processes on those would take enormous amount of time. My brother is playing a football manager game [his kids are also loving it, but they are too young to play, so mainy they are only watching their father as he is playing..   ], and in that game, he can choose what leagues to play in. When he runs 60+ leagues for example, even on a dual proc. high end pc, it takes 10-20 mins to process 1 weekend "turn" in the game. I guess the present day comps are still not ready to run these huge processes.
				__________________Dominions 3. Wallpapers & Logos 
-------
 
"Training is principally an act of faith. The athlete must believe in its efficacy: he must believe that through training he will become fitter and stronger, that by constant repetition of the same movements he will become more skillful."
			 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				December 4th, 2006, 12:36 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2005 
						Posts: 1,122
					 Thanks: 5 
		
			
				Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI concept of the \'80ies ... why? 
 In general there are three kinds of AIs, neural networks, smells and scent, and Brute Froce. 
 Anyone played Fields of Battle? That AI is quite powerful and selflearning using Neural networks.
 
 Problems with Dominions is that a Game would have to be played til the very end before the Neural Network could be updated. After programming the Neural network, which will be a pain, you will have to play plenty of game before the neural network would give a good AI. If the programming was powerful enough. In general this would probably be the optimal AI for dominions as it would learn from human players. But the amount of cells and how to program them seems to burdensome.
 
 Anyone played Galactic Civilization or any modern chess games? Those games give good AIs given brute force.
 
 Brute force is about calculating as many moves as possible to find an optimal move. Given the amount of possible moves in dominions, the computer would never be able to calculate far enough to separate move from eachother in terms on how good they are.
 
 Smells and Scent is the easiest AI to implement. You just give the AI some rules to follow and let it react on it's surroundings. I think this is the only way to go with Dominions, so all you can do is give better and more precise rules for the AI to follow.
 
			
			
			
			
				  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				December 4th, 2006, 12:45 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2005 
						Posts: 1,122
					 Thanks: 5 
		
			
				Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI concept of the \'80ies ... why? 
 Well, a comment on Brute Force. Brute Force is effective if you have a good algorithm to calculate strengh of positions. 
 In other words, How strong is my position now? How strong will it be if I recruit one mage?
 
 Perhaps smells and scent should be scent and shouts.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				December 4th, 2006, 12:55 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: athens, georgia 
						Posts: 274
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI concept of the \'80ies ... why? 
 Most chess games have a good opening library, position library for mid game, and position library for end game manuevers.  They also use brute force, but without the opening library etc. they are garbage....
 IOW, without a good starting rulebase (e.g. 10 preapproved good pretenders for each nation, etc.) then Dom III would still have problems.
 
				__________________--Uh-Nu-Buh, Fire/Death
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				December 3rd, 2006, 05:58 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: 500km from Ulm 
						Posts: 2,279
					 Thanks: 9 
		
			
				Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI concept of the \'80ies ... why? 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| mivayan said: Semi-related: is there a way to set a 'difficult' AI when changing from human to AI, for example to set up a single player challenge? Would be potentially bad for multiplay though.
 
 |  You might try to re-start the server with one of the following command line switches: 
    --easyai X      Nation ai controlled X=nation number (0-79) 
    --normai X      Nation ai controlled X=nation number (0-79) 
    --diffai X      Nation ai controlled X=nation number (0-79) 
    --mightyai X    Nation ai controlled X=nation number (0-79) 
    --impai X       Nation ai controlled X=nation number (0-79)
				__________________As for AI the most effective work around to this problem so far is to simply use an American instead, they tend to put up a bit more of a fight than your average Artificial Idiot.
 ... James McGuigan on rec.games.computer.stars somewhen back in 1998 ...
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				December 4th, 2006, 12:22 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Eastern Finland 
						Posts: 7,110
					 Thanks: 145 
		
			
				Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI concept of the \'80ies ... why? 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Arralen said: 
 
	You might try to re-start the server with one of the following command line switches:Quote: 
	
		| mivayan said: Semi-related: is there a way to set a 'difficult' AI when changing from human to AI, for example to set up a single player challenge? Would be potentially bad for multiplay though.
 
 |  --easyai X      Nation ai controlled X=nation number (0-79)
 --normai X      Nation ai controlled X=nation number (0-79)
 --diffai X      Nation ai controlled X=nation number (0-79)
 --mightyai X    Nation ai controlled X=nation number (0-79)
 --impai X       Nation ai controlled X=nation number (0-79)
 
 
 
 |  I thought those only affected game creation, but I guess it would be worth a try... |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		
		 Hybrid Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |