|
|
|
 |

January 16th, 2007, 06:48 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Montpellier, France
Posts: 208
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Thanks, it's clearer now. 
|

January 16th, 2007, 02:16 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,445
Thanks: 85
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Also, the bless has less effect if your unit isn't wearing a helmet. This is a real handicap to earth-bless Living Pillars.
__________________
You've sailed off the edge of the map--here there be badgers!
|

January 16th, 2007, 03:14 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Huh - I had no idea the earth bless was so finicky!
|

January 16th, 2007, 08:50 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Quote:
Ironhawk said:
Huh - I had no idea the earth bless was so finicky!
|
I agree... the earth bless should not be so picky
__________________
There can be only one.
|

January 17th, 2007, 05:49 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toulouse, FRANCE
Posts: 436
Thanks: 150
Thanked 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Once you understand that it's just +4 to "armor" value (and not directly to the protection), the rest just come from the normal rules of the game.
Sure, it could have been +4 to natural armor instead, but then it would hae worken with more units, but often with less effect (because natural armor has less effect when an armor is worn)
|

January 17th, 2007, 01:12 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Quote:
Jack_Trowell said:
Sure, it could have been +4 to natural armor instead, but then it would hae worken with more units, but often with less effect (because natural armor has less effect when an armor is worn)
|
Easy solution would be to have it provide +8 to natural armor instead.
__________________
There can be only one.
|

January 17th, 2007, 01:35 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Which would have been an actual +8 to units with only natural armor, right?
Seems to me it should have been possible, and preferable, to retain the Dom2 version of +4 to final protection, if necessary by introducing a new type of "holy" protection that stacks on top of armor (and helm).
|

January 17th, 2007, 01:44 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 559
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Deleted.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|