|
|
|
 |

January 16th, 2007, 02:16 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,445
Thanks: 85
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Also, the bless has less effect if your unit isn't wearing a helmet. This is a real handicap to earth-bless Living Pillars.
__________________
You've sailed off the edge of the map--here there be badgers!
|

January 16th, 2007, 03:14 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Huh - I had no idea the earth bless was so finicky!
|

January 16th, 2007, 08:50 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Quote:
Ironhawk said:
Huh - I had no idea the earth bless was so finicky!
|
I agree... the earth bless should not be so picky
__________________
There can be only one.
|

January 17th, 2007, 05:49 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toulouse, FRANCE
Posts: 436
Thanks: 150
Thanked 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Once you understand that it's just +4 to "armor" value (and not directly to the protection), the rest just come from the normal rules of the game.
Sure, it could have been +4 to natural armor instead, but then it would hae worken with more units, but often with less effect (because natural armor has less effect when an armor is worn)
|

January 17th, 2007, 01:12 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Quote:
Jack_Trowell said:
Sure, it could have been +4 to natural armor instead, but then it would hae worken with more units, but often with less effect (because natural armor has less effect when an armor is worn)
|
Easy solution would be to have it provide +8 to natural armor instead.
__________________
There can be only one.
|

January 17th, 2007, 01:35 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Which would have been an actual +8 to units with only natural armor, right?
Seems to me it should have been possible, and preferable, to retain the Dom2 version of +4 to final protection, if necessary by introducing a new type of "holy" protection that stacks on top of armor (and helm).
|

January 17th, 2007, 01:44 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 559
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Deleted.
|

January 17th, 2007, 02:27 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: E9 bless buggy with Abysia ?
Actually this thread starting with Abyssia complaining about the E9 bless.
I don't think it's a matter of it not being equally good for all sacreds/nations. Even in Dom2 where it was a straight +4 to protection, it was really only useful for units who already had good protection to start with. Going from 0 to 4 is not nearly as useful as 16 to 20. Just like the defensive Water bonus is far more useful for high defense units.
Other blesses may be more or less useful for some units, but Earth is the only level 9 bless I can think of that actually gives no effect to some units. That's what I don't like about it.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|