|
|
|
 |

January 25th, 2007, 03:23 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Gettysburg Sector
Posts: 785
Thanks: 7
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: What is the problem with SE5?
By Forced Simplification.
This process basically dictates that every aspect of the game's interface needs to be reduced to a point where as little thought as possible is needed in the determination of how to do something.
For example, component placement in ship design in SE5 requires you to click on a component, then place it on the ship schematic, then click to install it (i guess that's the word?) on to the schematic and so on.
Forced Simplification would force it to operate via drag and drop with the computer also able to allow us to double click a component to automatically install it into the design.
Another would be to remove the panning, zooming, and scrolling buttons and allow the player to merely right click and drag the camera while holding it to the position and angle the user desires, zooming would of course be handled by holding the right mouse button and spinning the scroll wheel back and forth.
And similar steps could be taken across the interface to reduce the insane number of mouse clicks required to do a single task.
|

January 25th, 2007, 03:56 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: What is the problem with SE5?
Using right-click for the camera would remove it for the UI, and I'm not sure that's a good thing.
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

January 25th, 2007, 04:00 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: What is the problem with SE5?
Azselendor said:
Forced Simplification would force it to operate via drag and drop...
Except that drag and drop is the same number of operations. Mouse down, move, mouse up, versus: Mouse click, move, mouse click. I'm not sure how that makes the interface any simpler to use?
Though really, drag and drop is a lot more operations overall, because in the current system you can do simple shift-clicks to add multiple copies of the same component without moving back to the component list and reselecting it. Double-click for auto placement beats both though.
|

January 25th, 2007, 04:07 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Gettysburg Sector
Posts: 785
Thanks: 7
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: What is the problem with SE5?
most people are used to drag and drop as a natural function of computer usage. Forced Simplification forces us to use simplest and most natural means of accomplishing a task.
|

January 25th, 2007, 05:25 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: What is the problem with SE5?
I just don't see how it would provide any improvement what-so-ever. There is a visual indicator of what is happening when you click on a component, just as you see in a normal drag and drop. It might take a split second to retry with just a click if you first try a drag and drop, but that is all.
If the current system was eliminated and replaced with drag and drop, it would slow ship design down tremendously. Drag and drop of one item at a time is extremely tedious. You could potentially keep the shift functionality to be able to add a second (and a twelfth) copy of a component with just clicks on nearby boxes, but that would seem to violate the "forced simplification."
"Forced Simplification" seems a little like buzz word marketing to me... ala synergy.
|

January 25th, 2007, 05:48 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 163
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: What is the problem with SE5?
I cant honestly say that drag and drop would make things any easier for me either.
|

January 25th, 2007, 10:11 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Gettysburg Sector
Posts: 785
Thanks: 7
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: What is the problem with SE5?
Actually Fyron, Forced Simplification isn't a buzzword. It's a term that originates in gaming and pioneered by the MIT BlackJack team.
|

January 25th, 2007, 10:37 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: What is the problem with SE5?
The problem is that Simpler != Easier
And I agree with Fy. Forced Simplification sounds a lot like a buzzword... maybe a larval buzzword.
__________________
Things you want:
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|