|
|
|
 |
|

March 9th, 2007, 10:15 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
Look for ndiswrapper in the list
Code:
gedit /etc/modules
|

March 9th, 2007, 10:22 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
Quote:
parabolize said:
Look for ndiswrapper in the list
Code:
gedit /etc/modules
|
# /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
#
# This file contains the names of kernel modules that should be loaded
# at boot time, one per line. Lines beginning with "#" are ignored.
lp
That's all. Don't see ndiswrapper in it.
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

March 9th, 2007, 10:27 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
Open it again this time as super user:
Code:
sudo gedit /etc/modules
Add it at the bottom of the list and save like so:
Code:
# /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time.
#
# This file contains the names of kernel modules that should be loaded
# at boot time, one per line. Lines beginning with "#" are ignored.
lp
ndiswrapper
edit: Why o why has it taken to double spacing stuff inside code tags? It wasn't a few posts ago...
|

March 9th, 2007, 10:36 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
Para, I owe you a beer.  Wireless is workign great now. Thanks for all the help.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

March 9th, 2007, 10:37 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
No problem. 
|

March 11th, 2007, 04:55 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: At work or sleeping
Posts: 821
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
Wish I'd opened this last week; I have a brand new OEM copy of XP:Pro, still in the cellophane wrapper.
Oops,
TT
__________________
Aa Turam Empire
Geekdom is eternal... you will be assimilated... resistance is futile.
A+ Se GdY S++ Fr- C* Cs* Sf- Ai++ Au>M! M- Mp! S@ Ss+ R! Pw+ Fq++ Nd? Rp++ G++ Mm++ Bb-- L-- Tcp
'We, the weird, chasing the pointless, for no reason at all, have been finding out things that have no effect on anything important for at least a couple days and are now qualified to chase our tails to the merriment of all watching.'-Narf et al
"Of course, you don't want to be going about handing out immortality willy-nilly, that just wouldn't be responsible." -O'Shea
|

March 11th, 2007, 02:34 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
What? You could have used Linux instead? Or you would have bought a retail copy of XP at the higher price instead?
I'll take the XP package if you don't want to use it.  Windows still has its uses. For a while, anyway.
|

March 19th, 2007, 05:34 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
Quote:
geoschmo said:

Para, I owe you a beer. Wireless is working great now. Thanks for all the help.
Geoschmo
|
OK, now that you've struggled through a Linux install maybe you can answer some questions. I am about to buy some new HDs and try to setup a dual boot system.  Does Linux still need a dedicated 'swap partition'? I'd like to know before I put the install disk in whether I should have reserved a few gigs for swap. And did you need to reconfigure and recompile the kernel to make it work or is this just an option? (How much of the stuff on the disk comes with source code? Basically everything? Or just the kernel and the little Gnu utilities?)
|

March 19th, 2007, 05:44 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
Yes you want a swap partition. How large depends on how much ram you got and how much processing power. You usually want twice your ram.
You usually don't need to recompile the kernel though adding non-free graphics modules is pretty normal (aka nvidia driver).
Almost none of a debian (ubuntu) install is source though all the packages have source available in the repositories. Other distributions are called source based and install/compile everything from source like Gentoo.
|

March 19th, 2007, 07:18 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Windows is too expensive
Yeah, I'm still up in the air about which distro to use. Novell is in trouble with the OSS community, or I'd go with their very 'Windows friendly' package. Fedora is another possibility. I've heard both good and bad things about Ubuntu. The effort to make it 'easy' like Windows has apparently cut some corners.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|