|
|
|
 |

March 10th, 2007, 03:50 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: LA Ermor - myth, legend, or overrated tripe?
On the other hand your lands can be a pretty nasty place to try an invade - anyone looking to lay into you is going to have to accept little in the way of gains. If you point that out you can play diplomacy a little more.
|

March 10th, 2007, 04:19 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: LA Ermor - myth, legend, or overrated tripe?
LA Ermor is actually not that strong in dom3. Annoying dominion effect, a decent nation but not overpowered as it was in Dom 2.
|

March 10th, 2007, 10:50 AM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: LA Ermor - myth, legend, or overrated tripe?
As kissblade said it isnt as strong as it was, mainly because of the increased gold and supplies from dom2.
|

March 10th, 2007, 11:21 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: LA Ermor - myth, legend, or overrated tripe?
I actually think that LE Ermor is slightly underpowered.
Ermor now gets just as many troops as everyone else, but only gets mages by spending gems - and since Ermor has approximately the same gem income as everyone else (a little bit higher, but not much), this is a big disadvantage once magic becomes highly important.
The upshot is that I think all of the LE Ermor nationals should be *half* as expensive or less. This wouldn't make a big difference in the early game, but your forces would stay roughly comparable as the game goes on. It'd also enable Ermor not to fall so far behind the research curve, as they generally do.
The increase in price on spectres hurt them a lot more than it hurt other positions - which would've been fine in dom2 when they were so devastating, but now that they're not it's an over-correction.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|

March 10th, 2007, 12:06 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 247
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: LA Ermor - myth, legend, or overrated tripe?
LA ermor is incredibly potent in SP. Try playing as them and you'll find that the AI simply cannot deal with you at all.
However, the general belief is that this is due to limitations with the AI. I don't play MP, but it seems that the ashen empire in MP is a shadow of it's single-player self
|

March 10th, 2007, 12:23 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: LA Ermor - myth, legend, or overrated tripe?
Playing against an AI ermor is also more challenging than otehr nations - it seems to eat lots of territory up and cn be harder than normal to go on the offense against (still not exactly hard).
|

March 10th, 2007, 12:32 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 481
Thanks: 42
Thanked 33 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: LA Ermor - myth, legend, or overrated tripe?
I suspect you'd need to insist on keeping the LA magic site frequency setting at "default" in order to make LA Ermor worthwhile in MP. That way, your starting gem income (15 vs 4 for everyone else) is more telling. But since I've never actually played them in MP, I'm probably just blowing smoke...
__________________
"I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part"
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|