|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |

May 30th, 2007, 07:55 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,423
Thanks: 103
Thanked 656 Times in 439 Posts
|
|
Re: TankSharp
And version 0.3 is done!
|

May 30th, 2007, 11:40 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 40km from the old frontline
Posts: 859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: TankSharp
Quote:
May I suggest for the future US AFVs which share a common chassis across all lines, like the IFV, SP Artillery, Tank etc; in that you design them so that they all have the same basic protection, perhaps 50mm of Rolled RHA (outer frontal hull), followed by about 650mm of void space then 50mm of Rolled RHA (Inner hull).
|
That's exactly what I had figured out for now. Without the metrics, of course, and that's where Tanksharp will be helpful.
If you look at my OOB, most Block-III combat vehicles have exactly the same hull armor levels.
Now I hope your latest version is advanced enough to include crew-in-hull ergonomics, advanced ERA and NERA, hybrid drives, DE weapons... 
|

May 31st, 2007, 04:42 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: TankSharp
"With 1950s and 1960s technology, yes; but not with 1970s and onward tank technology"
So did the designers of the 2S19, AUF-1, Palmaria, PzH 2000, AS90 etc, all post 60's stuff and none of which has armor exceeding the levels I described (judging from the information available), get it wrong ? And some of those are actually built using tank components.
I am all for standardization but sometimes it does not make sense. Using the same components (like engine and such) for maintenance ease is a good thing. But a tank and a SPA are on the opposite spectrum of the level of protection vs volume protected trade off. Unless you are designing a SPA turrett for the export market, to be mated with whatever tank hull is locally available (like the Denel T6) the approach described does not make much sense. Two 50mm layers of RHA is overkill for a SPA armor needs.
|

June 10th, 2007, 03:05 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London (Great Britain)
Posts: 855
Thanks: 210
Thanked 176 Times in 97 Posts
|
|
Re: TankSharp
Hi Mark, I downloaded your application some time ago but have only now had time to look at it. For some reason my laptop will not let me open your files. What programmes do I need to use them?
__________________
"Wir Deutschen sollten die Wahrheit auch dann ertragen lernen, wenn sie für uns günstig ist."
|

June 11th, 2007, 12:42 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kazakstan
Posts: 305
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: TankSharp
RecruitMonty
----------------
microsoft excel for XLS-file and adobe reader for PDF-file
|

June 11th, 2007, 03:53 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 40km from the old frontline
Posts: 859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: TankSharp
Just for info, the .ods file is an OpenOffice spreadsheet. (and I guess the .xls is the same one exported to the MS-addicted heathen like myself  )
|

June 11th, 2007, 02:59 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London (Great Britain)
Posts: 855
Thanks: 210
Thanked 176 Times in 97 Posts
|
|
Re: TankSharp
Thankyou, both very much. I will look into getting myself a copy of those programmes
__________________
"Wir Deutschen sollten die Wahrheit auch dann ertragen lernen, wenn sie für uns günstig ist."
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|