|
|
|
 |

June 12th, 2007, 12:21 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Questions about PD and other
People talked about a PD mod before - just using mod commands you could alter PD quite a bit. It wouldn't make it any more complicated, but it could be more useful/subtle.
|

June 12th, 2007, 01:26 AM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Questions about PD and other
Still, BigDisAwesome... I see no reason not to go with a mobile army, except that even with prod+1 my forces would be limited. By going with a little sloth and misfortune, I've got a huge research strat planned out. We'll see how it works, but even headed in the opposite direction its been rough expanding as Agartha. I've had a couple good situations... but with my current build I can afford 190 gold at a key province a LOT easier than forty troops. Doesn't mean I won't put some support there- but I don't even get archers or cavalary.
So, I have the option of a). Building no pd, and building forty lackluster troops in a turn, or b). Buying 20 pd, and building 20 lackluster troops who will support my superior golems. As a point of perspective, CTIS heavy infantry costs 15 resources. Agartha heavy infantry 27. Admittedly, some nations rival Agartha in resource cost for HI, but most nations also have chaff outside of indies. I don't.
|

June 12th, 2007, 02:36 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,445
Thanks: 85
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: Questions about PD and other
I don't see where you're saving gold, since you're not paying to maintain those PD troops. They're maintenance free, so that has to be a factor in the long run, right?
__________________
You've sailed off the edge of the map--here there be badgers!
|

June 12th, 2007, 08:58 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Questions about PD and other
Does the AI use PD?
Obviously, you *must* win against PD otherwise it is a waterloo!!!
|

June 12th, 2007, 11:21 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 332
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Questions about PD and other
Put me in the PD crowd. I like to have at least 11 PD in each province and prefer at least 21 in key provinces. At chokepoints, I'll go even higher.
|

June 12th, 2007, 12:18 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: Questions about PD and other
Quote:
HoneyBadger said:
I don't see where you're saving gold, since you're not paying to maintain those PD troops. They're maintenance free, so that has to be a factor in the long run, right?
|
I think that "the long run" is definetly a factor. In a small-map blitz game PD is a very different consideration than a long game, and different yet for a large map.
It also has a relaxing factor for the people who always complain about micro-management of every little thing in the game.
I think that everyone agrees that you really need to get at least ONE PD in every province. Then, depending on the nation and how good its PD is, for some reason I tend to go 6, 11, 21, 35. Factors are defense against attacks such as Call of the Winds, nearness to my castle, important provinces such as high population or important recruits, and finally having a castle there.
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|

June 12th, 2007, 02:25 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 481
Thanks: 42
Thanked 33 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Questions about PD and other
All right, stupid question here I suspect, but why 11 and 21 (mentioned by both Warhammer and Gandalf), and not 10 and 20?
10 gets your PD doing at least minimal patrolling (what's 11 get you but one more of each?), and 20 nets you the second commander and first "elite" unit, unless you're playing one of those x1/2 races like giants. Why the extra '1'?
__________________
"I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part"
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|