|
|
|
|
 |

June 12th, 2007, 02:09 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Use of mages
Mages *are* the firepower of an advanced army. Recruitable units are, by and large, just meatshields after a certain point. Look into the battlefield enchantment attack spells and also the higher level AOE battlefield spells.
|

June 12th, 2007, 02:34 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Use of mages
Oh, the pleasure!
Frying your opponents with Thunder Strikes, Magma Eruptions etc. or mincing them with those blood-thirsty, fire-spitting Archangels (Glory to the nation of Pythium!)is a rapture beyond your wildest dreams!
However, there is one very irritating issue regarding the use of heavy battlefield spells. Gems. You have to keep your mages stocked up if you want them to have any effect and dealing with this sort of micro-management is NOT fun - at least in SP games I find it very tedious and time-consuming.
|

June 12th, 2007, 02:41 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Use of mages
I'll admit I tend to rarely use gems for regular attack spells. Battlefield buffs and the like, sure, but not the regular AoE spells.
The only one mentioned so far is ShadowBlast, which is nice, but may not be worth the micromanagement most of the time.
It can be devastating at the right time: Someone's storming your castle, hand out nice shiny death gems to all you high death mages and watch the enemy go away.
|

June 20th, 2007, 11:53 AM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Use of mages
After more intensive SP playing I realise My use of magic is definitely suboptimal. That is why i have problems playing big maps. I just research and research and research, but i don't really use them , meanwhile i get a ton of gems sitting around and the computer starts killing me with his magic and my blessed units become outdated.
I have to force myself to actually use what i research. The problem is each spell (even up to lv6) is still not very powerful. You need to cast it multiple times to see it's power. But there's really a lot of micromanagement. I know you can store attack commands, but for rituals or forging it gets really old. Worse for nations with mages with lots of random paths...
Even for construction which is the school i know best, i underuse it.
I was trying the other day to mass produce some lucky pedants, but it was a pain trying to remember which of the 20 or so mages in my capital could forge it (not all had S1). Not to mention figuring out what to forge in the first place. Was a mage with 3D2N able to forge exactly the same stuff has a 3D2N1A at contruction 6?
All trying to remember which mages have cast site searching spells, you can make a mistake and you find 2 different mages cast the same site searching spell on the same province sigh.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++
There is a certain point where you have to say, enough is enough and stop the bulk of research and send your army of mages out there to conquer!!!
12 mages backed up with some minimal troops is quite amazing site with lv 6 magic.
|

June 20th, 2007, 12:08 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Use of mages
The auto site search should work pretty will for avoiding duplicate searches.
The 'F1' screen makes it easier to find the mages you need.
Summoned troops and commanders are probably the lowest micromanagement use of research and gems. Takes some experimentation to figure out which ones are most useful.
|

June 20th, 2007, 12:29 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Use of mages
Thanks I will be using those now.
Thanks for the idea about summoning.
I'm familiar with construction, alteration (mostly buff spells, alter fate! personal luck! Mirror image!), evocation (battle field attack ., Magma bolt! Flare! Blade wind!), enchantment (mix of buff battle field and ritual Gift of heath! ) and even thamutary (site searching, province attack) i kind of get.
Unfortunately conjuration it is a school that I least understand and familiar with, next to Blood.
Most of low levels summons (lv 5 and down) look like lemons
to me. The blood summons look okay, but i don't do blood magic. But that's another thread..
|

July 4th, 2007, 09:17 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Use of mages
Yeah, well, most of the low-level summons *are* lemons.  Except for some of the nationals. Right now, I like LA Agartha's Conj 4 Sepulchrals. Sacred, high-damage (24 Str + 11), decent attack, great protection (E9 + Legions of Steel = 20 Prot), cheap (4 death gems). Zero-encumbrance, and we all know how important that is. 65 hp and size 4 means even anti-undead spells like Dust to Dust don't have an easy time taking them down.
Flame Corpses (also LA Agartha) look promising, but I tried them against EA Pangaea's centaurs and they didn't kill many, probably because they centaurs have so many hit points. I think I'd rather spend the fire gems on Lightless Lanterns, but if anyone knows a good use for Flame Corpses I'll be glad to hear it.
-Max
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"
["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|