|
|
|
 |

June 27th, 2007, 01:22 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 674
Thanks: 7
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
Quote:
Jazzepi said:
Level 1 priests are just as effective as level 5 priests at spamming banishment.
Jazzepi
|
But are less effective against a high mr, since magic levels impact penetration, if I remember correctly.
horay 4 listening.
|

June 27th, 2007, 01:35 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
That, I did not know. I read on here that the banishment was exactly the same.
Jazzepi
|

June 27th, 2007, 02:15 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
Not only that, Banishment is AoE 2+(2* H level), Dam 3+(2* H level). According to the spell spreadsheet, not the manual, it's even range 15 + (5* H level).
H1: AoE 4, Dam 5, range 20
H2: AoE 6, Dam 7, range 25
H3: AoE 8, Dam 9, MR-1, range 30
H4: AoE 10, Dam 11, MR-1, range 35
H5: AoE 12, Dam 13, MR-2, range 40
(Extra bonus points if you go to the all effort of making an H5 priest just to cast banishment  )
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|

June 27th, 2007, 02:47 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 495
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
Actually, saxon raises a good point. Vanheim has extremely easy acces to archery neuters (Air bless, arrow fend). How will a buff to archers vs glamour actuallly weaken vanheim, save by makoing F9 W9 (slightly) less attractive?
I'm a SP player, mainly, and I should mention that I've never ran into the "Vans vs. Human player" situation before- It's usually Ry'leh or Ermor (Even MA).
__________________
Unus vocis. Unus manus. Unus Universitas. Unus Deus. Is est meus fatum praeeo pro totus populus.
Ut est meus fortuna.
|

June 27th, 2007, 03:33 AM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,712
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
I don't think this thread was to rehash the "Van's kick everyone's asses in the early game badly" thread. I think this thread was just to see if the 3.08 change actually weakened the vans somewhat.
The only player with any experience has been Jazzepi - who has said (from what i can tell) No, it hasn't.
|

June 27th, 2007, 03:55 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 883
Thanks: 14
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
Hm, when I ran a quick test with a screen of statues and 50 indy archers, the glamour did get dispelled on quite many vans. However, after that you're left with a problem how to kill low-resource-cost high-defence high-protection cavalry. Which is not easy.
But evocation spells at least seem to work better against Vans nowadays.
|

June 27th, 2007, 04:51 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 68
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Glamour post 3.08
banishment is almost USELESS against shadow vestals, no matter what priest you are, H1 or H3.
I did a test run just now, using 8 C'tis priest king(who has much better precision--10 to 7--than agartha priests) scripted to 5x banishment banish 27 shadow vestals led by one ermor priest(NO ASPOSTACY, that is), and the result is pretty ridiculous: the first wave of banishment go before bless killed 6 vestals, and that's pretty much about it. yes, the second and third wave killed only 1 of 21 left, leave me 20 experienced vestals and 8 good fried lizard holy meats.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|