|
|
|
 |

July 31st, 2007, 01:26 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows
Quote:
Atrocities said:
Who would have thought that some of the greatest epic literature of the last 100 years would all come from that little island nation.
|
LOL! You crack me up sometimes AT. This 'little island nation' does have something of a tradition when it comes to literature, and there's substantially more to 20th Century British literature than Rowling and Tolkien.
I've read the first Harry Potter book, and it was OK. I didn't really understand the hype, but then I'm not 9 years old. If it makes kids feel the way I did when I was a nipper reading the Narnia books, then the hype is justified.
IMHO a far better read (than Rowling, and probably even than Lewis) is Phillip Pulman's His Dark Materials Trilogy, which is another kids' series that appeals to adults, althouth admittedly HDM seems to be aiming a little older than Potter. Read the books now, so you can fully enjoy the big-screen cgi-fest that's hitting the cinemas soon.
I still think they should have cast Rik Mayall (in his Lord Flashheart persona) as Lord Asriel.
|

July 31st, 2007, 10:16 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 809
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows
Quote:
dogscoff said:
I've read the first Harry Potter book, and it was OK. I didn't really understand the hype, but then I'm not 9 years old. If it makes kids feel the way I did when I was a nipper reading the Narnia books, then the hype is justified.
|
I just finished reading the Narnia books to my boys.  Will start on the Hobbit and LotRs soonish.
Have no intention of reading the Harry Potter books to them.
|

August 1st, 2007, 01:24 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: tampa, fl
Posts: 1,511
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows
I didn't know about Harry Potter until about the 3rd book came out. This was before the first movie. I thought I'd give the first 3 books a try. I'm glad I did. Sure, it's not like the Lord of the Rings in its maturity. It's more like the Hobbit times 7. But I found myself getting hooked, and waiting every 2 or 3 years for the next book. And with each book, they were getting darker and longer. I think that's what I truly enjoyed about these books. They just got better as they went along. I just wanted some closure, however, at the end, and was not satisfied with the epilogue.
|

August 14th, 2007, 10:45 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows
Just finished it. (Actually them, I was re-reading the whole serie for the past two weeks.)
It's not LotR where Frodo's sacrifice prevents him to live happily thereafter, defeating Voldemort was the way for Harry Potter to become whole again. It's normal therefore that it would end in "they lived happily after that". Caduceus is dead right on the family thing.
I was half-expecting it to end with either Ginny and Harry or Hermione and Ron dying though (and that actually makes the book better, because you're not as confident the heroes will survive at the end, and you care more for them).
Atrocities, I don't understand how you can tell that... England was always known for it's great literature. The book that has struck me the most is I think 1984. Actually I think that there are many references to it in the Deathly Hallows.
I don't really understand why do you call it "nonsense". It's not because it's overhyped that it's not a great book. And, as always, there's truth to the hype. And it's not like LotR didn't have the Frodo Lives! graffities On New York subway walls, or "Gandalf President!" badges....
Me too, I didn't like the first two that much when I first read them, because I was 16-17 when I read them, and I've grown up with the Hobbit and LotR (and Narnia a little bit).
But the Prisoner of Azkaban had something, and I really appreciated the Order of the Phoenix when I read it for the second time.
I think the Deathly Hallows is the best of them. It might be because it was directed to a more mature audience, or because I've found the Half-Blood Prince somewhat of a disappointment, but I think it's probably because the 6th and the 7th book should not be read separately. It's really different from the other books, you don't have the whole Hogwarts business that was getting a little bit annoying, more dark also, even if that would not alone make the book great.
It's actually a LOT better than I expected, I thought the serie peaked with tome 3, and was wearing away with the 6th.
I'm now even looking forward to re-read them all when the last film comes out, because of the last book... I was not sure before, that I would do it.
BTW, I fear the last film will not be good at all. I don't know how they will be compress all the book in even as much as 3 hours. LotR will have been a piece of cake compared to it.
I would have preferred to read them all before seeing the films, but we live in a different world...
|

August 15th, 2007, 10:33 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows
Something that everyone thought, but did not really dare speak about : (  )
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x26...ermione-sn_fun
|

August 15th, 2007, 03:55 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 470
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows
heh I remember that clip, that fat buttnugget horatio sanz almost ruined the sketch.... just like every other sketch that no tallent hack was in...
|

August 15th, 2007, 09:29 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|