Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN

[llamabeast]

I don't think there is much point in playing Patala vs T'ien Ch'i. As EvilHomer says, T'ien Ch'i probably is a stronger nation, although not particularly because of its PD. MA Ulm vs Bandar Log would be much more meaningful, because many of us feel that Bandar Log would have an advantage, whereas you are certain that Bandar Log can NEVER WIN.

[Folket]

That reminds me that I won a blitz with Bandar Log against Ermor and Pangaea, who are both considered strong MA nations.

[llamabeast]

Oh! Wow Folket. Well in that case I guess the whole thread is disproved.

If you would submit your win to the Victorious Nations thread it would make me very happy.

[Evilhomer]

Duels, blitzes etc are not reported usually to the victorious nation thread, would just flood it I fear

[Folket]

Shall we start recording all duel and blitz wins there? That will give more number but I think it will only start to show what nations people like to play.

In general I do not find the monkey troops that weak. I have played Bandar Log and Patala in MP with fair success.

[Evilhomer]

Might be a plan to have them in a seperate stickied thread. I do belive you have an ordinary game with LA marignon unreported anyway...

[Folket]

that is true. I should report that at a time.

[Sombre]

Speaking of thread hi-jacks, here's a mod I just made in response to this thread that has obvious implications for some kind of PD mod in the future.

http://www.shrapnelcommunity.com/thr...vc=#Post563021

It applies the '4 to a base' stuff I used for skavenslave and gnoblar chaff in the Skaven and Ogre Kingdoms mods to our own MA Bandar Log. It's in beta, but might be fun for you to try.

[NTJedi]

Evilhomer said:
Might be a plan to have them in a seperate stickied thread. I do belive you have an ordinary game with LA marignon unreported anyway...

Blitzes should definitely be recorded seperately perhaps in the same sticky, but one or two posts further down.