|
|
|
 |

November 13th, 2007, 09:44 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Star Trek Movie (XI)
You can see Spock here
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/34774
I'm also surprised at your "Romulus, my father" reference. I would have thought only Australians would know about it.
Harlan Ellison by the way is being a jerk about their plan to use one of his ideas. Great writer I gather, but a jerk. Mind you the original ST makers didn't know the difference between ruins and runes
|

November 13th, 2007, 11:10 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Star Trek Movie (XI)
I tried going there, but there was an annoying, un-closeable advertisement.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|

November 14th, 2007, 12:12 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Star Trek Movie (XI)
|

November 14th, 2007, 12:28 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 995
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Star Trek Movie (XI)
Are they up to 11 already? Jasus. I'll go see it though, just because it is Star Trek. I'm hoping and praying that they'll get back to the original spirit of TOS, without all that moral preachy bull**** that's frankly been ruining the series.
__________________
Suction feet are not to be trifled with!
|

November 14th, 2007, 12:51 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Star Trek Movie (XI)
I understand there are two camps to ST fans.
Those who prefer it to be clean, hopeful and free of modern day concerns.
and,
dark, where there are still lots of problems and you need to be sneaky, such as tricking another empire into joining a war on your side when you are at risk of losing.
I much prefer the later. Yeah I'm a political realist
People, who I have never really understood, seem to go on about whomever it was that took over after Gene Rodenberrys death ruining the franchise. There are a lot of things about Star Trek I disagree with, which I won't go into at the moment because I don't feel like going there, but I usually just don't let it bother me and I enjoy the special effects and occasional great episode.
We can, if you like, list our favourite episodes. For me
The two parter of Voyager with the ship that removes the target from time.
The Enterprise mirror episodes.
Any Klingon epsiode.
I like Enterprise despite the fact it didn't do, until too late, what it should have been from the start (season 3 was a major mistake). The whole run should have been season 4 stuff, but I don't let it bother me. I don't run the TV companies so why get depressed by what I don't control.
oh, and the Dominion war.
|

November 14th, 2007, 01:19 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 995
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Star Trek Movie (XI)
I do not like the clean, hopeful Star Trek. The whole, "Let's solve our problems with idealism! And technology!" attitude makes my channel-flicking finger very itchy. Well, I'm not entirely against the "let's solve our problems with technology" part, because it's sci-fi, so of course technology will play a part in it.
And coming up with some neat little gadget to solve a particular problem that we can look at and say, "Wow, that's cool," is good sci-fi technofantasy. Realigning the phase coil inductors is not.
Why not just say, "Well, Captain, what we're going to do, see, is load the magazines with bovine fecal matter, and fire it out the torpedo tubes. Oh look, the bovine fecal matter blew them up! Aren't we clever?" Because that, and realigning the phase coil inductors, is exactly the same damn thing.
__________________
Suction feet are not to be trifled with!
|

November 14th, 2007, 01:39 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Star Trek Movie (XI)
There's a Voyager epsiode where they fight the Borg. They fire the Phasers at the Borg. You know beam of light goes from Voyager to Borg ship then stays for a little bit too long. The Borg ship then pulsed back along the beam to Voyager. Cue sparks and such. Someone says
"What happened"
and 7 of 9 says
"They reversed the beam with a feed back pulse"
Is it really technobabble when that makes perfect sense? I mean the pulse goes back in the opposite direction and damages the emitters. Looks like a feedback pulse to me.
In fact it makes so much sense I would expect Star Fleet to plan against that tactic. Don't leave the Phaser beam in place so long, or use disruptors. Except that the disruptor beam would leave an ionisation trail and due to the need to align the disruptor pulse to pass through the ships shields that would leave a trail that could penetrate the shields in return.
|

November 16th, 2007, 12:10 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,205
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Star Trek Movie (XI)
DS9 was great in the latter seasons, a la the Dominion Wars. Some of the best Trek that ever, I think.
__________________
Courage doesn't always roar. Sometimes courage is that little voice at the end of the day that says "I'll try again tomorrow".
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot in the past. Wisdom is knowing that you'll be an idiot in the future.
Download the Nosral Confederacy (a shipset based upon the Phong) and the Tyrellian Imperium, an organic looking shipset I created! (The Nosral are the better of the two [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Grin.gif[/img] )
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|