|
|
|
|
 |

March 14th, 2002, 12:31 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Meson vs. Anti-Proton
quote: Actually WMG has 30% bonus (which means that it will always have AT LEAST 30% chance of hitting target - no matter what) and torpedoes don't have any bonus
That minimum to-hit thing has been fixed for gold.
It is now just a straight +30%.
__________________
Things you want:
|

March 14th, 2002, 12:46 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Meson vs. Anti-Proton
Fixed? I consider that breaking it. I liked being able to give weapons a higher minimum to hit bonus. I guess the Target Acquired Gunnery Mount in Deathstalker's Mount Mod will have to be beefed up a bit (say, +1000 to hit bonus).
|

March 16th, 2002, 10:47 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: iola, ks, usa
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Meson vs. Anti-Proton
|

March 16th, 2002, 10:58 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Meson vs. Anti-Proton
He's saying this: Before Gold, WMGs had a minimum of 31% chance to hit at any range at which they could shoot, regardless of whatever other modifiers would be in play. You could have -180% or so, and you'd still have a 31% chance to hit. AM torpedoes had a minimum of 11% (I think), and so on. Weapon mount bonuses did this too. In Gold, the minimum chance to hit has been "fixed" so that the weapon's chance to hit doesn't affect it. If you have Combat Sensors I and a WMG, you will still get a +25% and a +30%, for a total of +55%, to hit bonus. You will no longer have the increased minimum to hit, it will now be 1%.
|

March 16th, 2002, 11:08 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: iola, ks, usa
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Meson vs. Anti-Proton
Ahhhhhh! I see!!! Comprehension has been achieved!!!
Thanx for clearing that up, IF. 
|

March 16th, 2002, 08:27 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Meson vs. Anti-Proton
No problem! Glad I could help.
|

March 16th, 2002, 10:57 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Meson vs. Anti-Proton
Actually Mesons were trown away in SEIV as they both cost more to research, weaker and have shorter range than APB. Same to torpedoes - only the latest quantum torpedoes can do a lot of damage, others are weak. It is better to research lvl.12 APB than research lvl.5 mesons or lvl.10 torpedoes. Back in SE3, my Meson-Torpedoes destroyers were unstoppable.
Organic brings that back . . . . 
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|