|
|
|
|
 |
November 15th, 2007, 03:14 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
yes, do as you wish - its just a war w/ subbed nations :-)
but asking people to invade you... after one small battle, which you could easily have avoided, and the vast majority of your forces intact having lost 1 territory,... you know, that's the pissy part  |
November 15th, 2007, 06:58 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 14
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
i like being invited into other countrys, so LA Ulm has become very symphatethic lately.  |
November 15th, 2007, 08:11 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 440
Thanks: 16
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Quote:
archaeolept said:
-- after one small battle, which you could easily have avoided, --
|
Avoided, how? That's kinda funny. You are saying there's something I could've done to stop you from attacking?
That's just stupid.
Quote:
and the vast majority of your forces intact having lost 1 territory,...
|
Yeah? Guess what? I know I can't win (a war nor the game), and the war you chose to start was just the last nail in the coffin. Could as well make sure BEFORE I have lost all my lands that you don't get them all.
Why *wait* for death when I can have it in a few turns? |
November 15th, 2007, 09:05 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
oh, whatever sensori. its just a game. I gave you a one turn warning; you surely could have retreated your pretender from right in front of my army. you didn't. I know how it feels, but I had to do something to try and improve my position.
|
November 15th, 2007, 09:52 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 440
Thanks: 16
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
What? I don't care about that stupid gimpass idiot Pretender which is a big part of why this setup sucked (and I'm pretty sure it's a big reason why the original player quit). You did me a favor by killing him. I *want* to have Ulm die, the sooner the better. How hard is that to understand? Giving this nation to someone wouldn't have been fair - only putting it to AI would've been. That's how much it sucks.
|
November 15th, 2007, 09:55 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
lol ok - i'll try my best then :-)
|
November 15th, 2007, 10:38 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
As much as I love all this drama - could someone please invade Mictlan now?
He's going to avoid fighting my superior army and raid me if he can - which means that he'd be utterly vulnerable on his capital except that he's *so huge I'll never reach it*!
So, you know, get him!
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
November 17th, 2007, 07:45 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 14
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Remember me to check if the mercs have troops, so that i wont buy leaders without troops for too much money anymore. (doh)
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
