|
|
|
 |

March 19th, 2002, 09:09 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Supply I component is too ineffective.
Yep. See Proportions mod, for example.
However, I think there is an abstract rationale that can be applied to make sense of the basic set. That is, engines can be thought of as _producing_ energy as they burn fuel. As such, they are a power source. Or, the engines can be seen to reduce the ship class' ability to include other components by 10kT, but in actuality they themselves are still larger than the supply storage units - it's just that increasing engines doesn't reduce the size class' potential as much. Also, there is the game balance rationale that extending operating range should be somewhat expensive. All told though, I agree with you, hence my mod.
PvK
|

March 22nd, 2002, 07:29 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: California
Posts: 521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Supply I component is too ineffective.
Actually for all you people that are Organics minded the supply component is useful when engines are too expensive for those one turn ships. If an engine costs 160 and a supply component is cheaper (like half or less) then it is better because you can make the ship in one turn instead of two (much much better)
sorry im kind aoutof it
__________________
Come join the forces of democracy and fight for independence from Totalitarianism, Dictatorships, Emperors and Empresses, Oligarchys and Fundamentalists at SE4 by Committee
|

March 22nd, 2002, 07:36 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Supply I component is too ineffective.
Another point:
Adding engines does NOT increase your ship's range, it just makes you burn fuel faster, and get there quicker.
No matter how many engines you add, your ships will have a maximum range of 50 squares, at which point you're outta fuel.
Solar panel and supply bays do increase your range.
That said, I quartered the size of supply bays for P&N in order to make them useful.
__________________
Things you want:
|

March 22nd, 2002, 07:40 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Supply I component is too ineffective.
quote: Originally posted by Skulky:
Actually for all you people that are Organics minded the supply component is useful when engines are too expensive for those one turn ships. If an engine costs 160 and a supply component is cheaper (like half or less) then it is better because you can make the ship in one turn instead of two (much much better)
sorry im kind aoutof it
Are you taking about a Mod? In the standard game, Cargo I and Ion Engine I both cost 200 Metal and both store 500 units of supply? However, Ion Engine takes 10KT of space and Cargo I takes 20KT.
|

March 22nd, 2002, 07:50 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Supply I component is too ineffective.
quote: Originally posted by Suicide Junkie:
Another point:
Adding engines does NOT increase your ship's range, it just makes you burn fuel faster, and get there quicker.
No matter how many engines you add, your ships will have a maximum range of 50 squares, at which point you're outta fuel.
Solar panel and supply bays do increase your range.
That said, I quartered the size of supply bays for P&N in order to make them useful.
True, but speed is usually of the essense, especially in the early land rush stage of the game. The difference in range between a colonizer with one Supply Bay and 5 Engines and one with 2 Supply Bays and 3 Engines is something like 60 squares versus 83 squares. The different in range just is not worth it. 60% speed for 140% range.
Quartering the size of Supply Bays in the Mod seems like a good pricing point. Then the issue is pay more for the ship with the two Supply Bays or leave them off. Did you leave the metal cost alone?
[ 22 March 2002: Message edited by: LGM ]
|

March 22nd, 2002, 07:58 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Supply I component is too ineffective.
quote: Originally posted by LGM:
Are you taking about a Mod? In the standard game, Cargo I and Ion Engine I both cost 200 Metal and both store 500 units of supply? However, Ion Engine takes 10KT of space and Cargo I takes 20KT.
I think he's talking about higher tech in the standard game. Ion Engines are cheap compared to higher tech engines, which are more expensive than supply components.
PvK
|

March 22nd, 2002, 08:02 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Supply I component is too ineffective.
P&N does leave the price at $200. However, engines cost much more rads than minerals, so the two components can coexist without creating horrible build times.
__________________
Things you want:
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|