|
|
|
View Poll Results: Who is the most powerful EA nation?
|
Arcoscephale
|
  
|
2 |
2.63% |
Ermor
|
  
|
1 |
1.32% |
Ulm
|
  
|
1 |
1.32% |
Maverni
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Sauromatia
|
  
|
4 |
5.26% |
T'ien Ch'i
|
  
|
4 |
5.26% |
Mictlan
|
  
|
13 |
17.11% |
Abysia
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Caelum
|
  
|
5 |
6.58% |
C'tis
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Pangaea
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Argatha
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Tir na n'Og
|
  
|
1 |
1.32% |
Formoria
|
  
|
2 |
2.63% |
Vanheim
|
  
|
4 |
5.26% |
Helheim
|
  
|
6 |
7.89% |
Niefelheim
|
  
|
13 |
17.11% |
Kailasa
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Yomi
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Atlantis
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
R'lyeh
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Oceania
|
  
|
1 |
1.32% |
Lanka
|
  
|
19 |
25.00% |
 |

March 20th, 2008, 11:51 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,741
Thanks: 21
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: Who is the most powerful nation and why?
I really only play the MA, but fought some of the other eras in the Big Game:
1. EA Lanka insane bless, powerful summons, demons do not have as many counters as undead, and decent air magic.
2. MA-no race really strikes dread in me in the MA.
But Ermor and Pythium are likely the top 2.
3. LA Ryleh
__________________
"War is an art and as such is not susceptible of explanation by fixed formula."
- General George Patton Jr.
|

March 20th, 2008, 11:57 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Most powerful blood nation?
How does EA Lanka stack up against EA Mictlan? I was reading a thread comparing who was the most powerful blood nation (I will post it if I can find it again). The gist of the arguments seemed to be Lanka is more versatile, but Mictlan is more focuses and has lower upkeep for it's primary blood hunters. Of course, perhaps you could switch to using summons for blood hunting and then not pay any gold upkeep, but I'm not sure how well that would work.
|

March 21st, 2008, 02:55 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: Most powerful blood nation?
Quote:
moderation said:
How does EA Lanka stack up against EA Mictlan? I was reading a thread comparing who was the most powerful blood nation (I will post it if I can find it again). The gist of the arguments seemed to be Lanka is more versatile, but Mictlan is more focuses and has lower upkeep for it's primary blood hunters. Of course, perhaps you could switch to using summons for blood hunting and then not pay any gold upkeep, but I'm not sure how well that would work.
|
I was arguing in that thread (too lazy too look it up) that EA Mictlan has a tighter focus on blood than Lanka for a couple reasons. Not only are the blood hunters cheaper, so are their sacreds - and well pretty much everything. Mictlan also has greater motivation to focus on blood whereas Lanka could very well do a very effective weak or no blood strategy. Mictlan also has a good upkeep free national summonable blood hunter (who doubles as a leech spamming assassin) that pays for herself in about half a year. I'm not as familiar with Lanka, do they have a reasonably priced summonable blood hunter?
I think that Mictlan will be able to pull in more blood slaves and has more motivation to focus on blood research. I think they are the heavyweight champions of the blood game, but I don't know that I think they're overall stronger than Lanka.
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|