Well, I'm through with the game

[AstralWanderer]

Aezeal said:
Well it's a strategy game too, and strategy gaming sort of demands opponents that put up a fight...It's your game of course but I think a majority of the people here would think it was a better game if there was some AI behind choosing the scales (or several dozen pre-created pretenders) just becuase it would then put up more of a fight and not kill itself

I'd second this - I personally do not game online (so won't ever try MP for Dominions or anything else) and would suggest that many "anti-social gamers" are less likely to post at forums, hence the MP bias here.

The exploration/role-playing aspects are certainly fine for the initial games, but a competent AI is really necessary for long-term appeal.

In the case of scales, it would seem fairly simple to keep the random generation but to add a sanity check to force a reroll when a clearly unfavourable combination (Turmoil/Death/Misfortune) comes up. Having more specific selection criteria for certain nations (LA Ermor probably doesn't need Growth, the Nordic nations shouldn't choose Heat) would help the AI without decreasing variety.

[Kristoffer O]

I think there are some criteria for national scales. This was the case in dom2 at least. There might have been unintentional changes to this. IIRC Ermor was hardcoded to have other settings than other nations and cold/heat loving nations often took the preffered scale, but with the differentiation into eras and a tripling of nations numbers this might have been screwed up, (probably not the cold/heat stuff, but possibly ermor's preferences).