Global War (use new thread pls)

otthegreat · #1 March 30th, 2008, 11:50 AM

Are you looking for another evil nation? if so I would really like to join the game.

CUnknown · #2 March 30th, 2008, 12:24 PM

Okay, you are in otthegreat.

Is 9 Evil, 5 Good, 2 Neutral good? We could do 1 more Evil or Neutral perhaps. I think this would be good, though.

If Good jumps on an Evil, killing them in the first few turns or whatever, then the Neutrals will think twice before allying with Good in the beginning.

And what about the actual composition of the teams? Is everyone happy with balance? (Should we make our pretenders and start?)

Kheldron · #3 March 30th, 2008, 01:51 PM

If you want another player, any side, I'm in.
I was out for the weekend and feel sooo sorry that this thread went so fast in just one weekend. Already full :-/

Cerlin · #4 March 30th, 2008, 02:44 PM

I think we could use one more neutral, we could let Kheldron be that neutral. I would be ok with it. The neutrals would still be outnumbered buy a lot but they would be a good way to balance both sides aggression.

otthegreat · #5 March 30th, 2008, 02:54 PM

I'll take LA Ulm, or if people really want an Evil player to be LA Ermor I could take them instead. I also think that one more neutral would be good.

Ylvali · #6 March 30th, 2008, 04:33 PM

Myself I think the third neutral could be a water nation, but not R�lyeh. It would be cool to have a neutral oceania or atlantis lurking around.

Otherwise we could have an AI water nation, just to add some unpredictable coastal attacks to the game.

Kheldron · #7 March 30th, 2008, 05:57 PM

Well, if you confirm I can play in this game, I'd either play MA Rlyeh or MA Pangea if Rlyeh bothers you all too much ^^