|
|
|
 |

July 23rd, 2008, 01:59 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florence, Italy
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 740
Thanked 112 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
Re: Marignon Man at Arms
Hey, the afflictions on flagellants are so damn thematic! I mean, they bash themselves all the day! If we start removing the thematic things, were do we end up?
__________________
IN UN LAMPO DI GLORIA!
|

July 23rd, 2008, 02:24 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Marignon Man at Arms
Except that they are so bad, they're almost completely useless. On an already marginal sacred unit.
Just cutting back the frequency would be nice. Ideally, I'd like to see them start uninjured (newly dedicated flagellants would be unlikely to have crippled themselves yet), but have a fairly small chance of developing an affliction every month. Preserving the thematic flavor, but leaving the troops useful, especially if you don't intend to keep them around for long 
|

July 23rd, 2008, 03:06 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Marignon Man at Arms
Quote:
thejeff said:
Just cutting back the frequency would be nice. Ideally, I'd like to see them start uninjured (newly dedicated flagellants would be unlikely to have crippled themselves yet), but have a fairly small chance of developing an affliction every month. Preserving the thematic flavor, but leaving the troops useful, especially if you don't intend to keep them around for long
|
This would require coding in new mechanics. Having a percent chance of getting starting afflictions is an existing mechanic, which becomes available for modding in the next patch.
|

July 23rd, 2008, 03:12 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Marignon Man at Arms
As I assumed. Which is why I started by suggesting just cutting back the frequency.
|

July 23rd, 2008, 07:13 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Marignon Man at Arms
Besides.. who says its thematic.
It wasn't in Dom2 at all.
Additionally, wearing horsehair and beating yourself with straps or knots - how does that lead to diease, battle frigth, limps etc.?
There are still orders of flagellent monks - 'mortification of the flesh' was what they hoped to acheive aka the will to withstand the temptations of the flesh, and to subjugate the body to the spirit.
I would argue this leads to higher morale, magic resistance and hitpoints, not afflictions.
NOWHERE in medieval history did flagellants have anywhere near the incident of affliction that Dom3 does.
|

July 23rd, 2008, 07:50 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 25
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: Marignon Man at Arms
> NOWHERE in medieval history did flagellants have anywhere near the incident of affliction that Dom3 does.
Also they did not fight, so we can remove them altogether. Problem solved 
|

July 23rd, 2008, 07:58 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Marignon Man at Arms
Hahah.
|

July 23rd, 2008, 10:43 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Marignon Man at Arms
Quote:
Kristoffer O said:
> NOWHERE in medieval history did flagellants have anywhere near the incident of affliction that Dom3 does.
Also they did not fight, so we can remove them altogether. Problem solved
|
Feel free KO. They are useless.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|