|
|
|
 |

September 1st, 2008, 02:18 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
My apologies on the matter. In chris' defense he has actually suffered 2 staled turns, which at this point can lead to quite a set back. This is especially true considering his original strategy.
Either way I believe chris might have staled anyhow considering the original deadline was early today, not sometime tomorrow as he perceived.
I am willing to delay turn 14 in order to find a replacement. Though I'm sure that might take a couple of days to find. I also bet Ry'leh would be eager to have a bit of coast uninhabited by an active player.
My encouragement to chris is to stick it out if you can. I have come to this point in a few games myself and would dearly have regretted giving up. Jim can contest to this since he was in the last game I played.
Last edited by AreaOfEffect; September 1st, 2008 at 02:21 PM..
|

September 1st, 2008, 02:21 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AreaOfEffect
My apologies on the matter. In chris' defense he has actually suffered 2 staled turns, which at this point can lead to quite a set back. This is especially true considering his original strategy.
Either way I believe chris might have staled anyhow considering the original deadline was early today, not sometime tomorrow as he perceived.
I am willing to delay the game further in order to find a replacement. Though I'm sure that might take a couple of days to find. I also bet Ry'leh would be eager to have a bit of coast uninhabited by an active player.
My encouragement to chris is to stick it out if you can. I have come to this point in a few games myself and would dearly have regretted giving up. Jim can contest to this since he was in the last game I played.
|
GNOGNOGNOGNGOGNGNOM
COASTLINE!
Jazzepi
|

September 1st, 2008, 04:58 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AreaOfEffect
My encouragement to chris is to stick it out if you can. I have come to this point in a few games myself and would dearly have regretted giving up. Jim can contest to this since he was in the last game I played.
|
AOE does indeed have an iron will, a spine like an oak, and testicles like coconuts.
He also sets up a mean communion. 
|

September 1st, 2008, 10:20 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
I suspect they just want your tasty delicious gem income that you have worked so hard for.
P.S.: Ulm's PD is so good.
Last edited by AreaOfEffect; September 1st, 2008 at 10:34 PM..
|

September 2nd, 2008, 12:18 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AreaOfEffect
Either way I believe chris might have staled anyhow considering the original deadline was early today, not sometime tomorrow as he perceived.
|
No. I met all the deadlines as published by llamaserver, except this one which was moved up. I even said I was going to be away labor day weekend!
I think it wasn't kosher to move it up AoE; moving it up, after a server outage, after an upgrade, and after a request not to -but it can't really be undone at this point - so whats the point?
Anyway the position has some strong positivies. I'm not dropping as it isn't playable, I'm dropping because of disgust. But I'll help a sub anyway I can, to minimize disruption.
|

September 2nd, 2008, 12:32 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
I'm sorry you're disgusted. You've already placed yourself as AI. The only way to undo that as far as I know is to roll back the previous turn. Yet, if we are going to roll back one turn then why not two?
I'm personally not going to decide on this though as it has way too many consequences. Those already embroiled in war would obviously change many of their actions based on the results of previous failures. If all of the players are for it then I'm willing to do the roll backs, but only if their is a reasonable consensus.
|

September 2nd, 2008, 01:37 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrispedersen
Quote:
Originally Posted by AreaOfEffect
Either way I believe chris might have staled anyhow considering the original deadline was early today, not sometime tomorrow as he perceived.
|
No. I met all the deadlines as published by llamaserver, except this one which was moved up. I even said I was going to be away labor day weekend!
I think it wasn't kosher to move it up AoE; moving it up, after a server outage, after an upgrade, and after a request not to -but it can't really be undone at this point - so whats the point?
Anyway the position has some strong positivies. I'm not dropping as it isn't playable, I'm dropping because of disgust. But I'll help a sub anyway I can, to minimize disruption.
|
Little late. You can't undo going AI.
Jazzepi
|

September 2nd, 2008, 02:28 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Umm... does changing to AI violate a NAP? 
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|