|
|
|
 |
|

October 3rd, 2008, 01:54 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AreaOfEffect
Thanks for doing what you could. It was much better then letting the nation go AI.
To Vanheim: I hope your large army likes dying a slow and painful death in a disease infested swamp. I suppose I neglected to mention that feature of the landscape.
|
Yeah, lets call that a beginner's mistake... I'm using that same die-in-the-swamp strategy in singleplayer games all the time!
I'm really noticing that one turn at this point of the game needs actually lots of time and attention to be carried out succesfully without being infested with simple mistakes. I just dropped out of my second game so I could concentrate more on Standards, I hope it improves my gameplay a bit.
I had my last turn actually carefully played out in good time, but then my son came and pressed the power off from the computer. I had to replay the turn in haste last night, so I blame him for any mistakes I made 
|

October 3rd, 2008, 01:54 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Could I please get a 72 hour extension? I'll be gone this weekend.
Jazzepi
|

October 3rd, 2008, 05:16 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
No problem.
|

October 7th, 2008, 09:09 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 477
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Let it be known that Ashdod has perpetrated an unprovoked attack against the Nation of Man in violation of our NAP. Let this be evidence to all other nations the cost of tolerating their continued existence as their wanton lust for conquest will not be sated until all lands are crushed beneath their gargantuan heels.
(Actually I'm somewhat happy you made a move, it was getting a bit boring and I'm interested to see if I'll be able to topple your giants. Also, how the the heck did this thread fall to the second page?)
|

October 8th, 2008, 04:11 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, nr Wales
Posts: 1,539
Thanks: 226
Thanked 296 Times in 136 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
@ Fakeymcfake
There was never any Ashdod-Man NAP in existence to break. The only agreement we ever had was an early peace signing to allow each of our nations to expand without clashing with each other. And this is very different from a NAP. Also, if you did believe you had a NAP with Ashdod, then it is you who broke it first by sending stealthy preachers into Ashdod lands. That is always a sure fire way to violate an NAP.
But politics aside  I'm looking forward to some good battles ahead against the archery kings of Avalon
Edit: Greeting Mictlan 
Last edited by Calahan; October 8th, 2008 at 04:18 AM..
|

October 8th, 2008, 10:56 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Greeting Ashdod.
I certianly couldn't let you have all the fun wothout any of the challenge. Lucky for you I've got my neighbors knocking on the door. Do you think I should let them in?
P.S.: I cast a summon spell. I hope you like it.
|

October 8th, 2008, 12:15 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 477
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
I was fairly certain that we had a 3 turn NAP along with that boarder agreement, could be mistaken though as I'm bad about remembering details. Anyhow the priest was just poking about due to the massive amounts of troops you had sitting on our boarders. In any event, don't take what I say too literally (especially in-game) as I enjoy overly bombastic rhetoric and rarely have a chance to let loose.
In any effect it's now a moot point as war from any cause is still war, and despite the odds I plan on winning or at least severely annoying you to the point of utter frustration.
Last edited by Fakeymcfake; October 8th, 2008 at 12:25 PM..
|

October 8th, 2008, 12:46 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, nr Wales
Posts: 1,539
Thanks: 226
Thanked 296 Times in 136 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
@ AoE - Can't promise you'll have any fun in Ashdodian lands, but you are welcome to have a look  and if you feel the need to cast a spell or two to aid your enjoyment, then go right ahead  And I'm pretty sure it's good manners to open your door whenever somebody knocks on it. I'm certainly expecting such a courtesy off you when I come-a-banging on Mictlan HQ
@ Fakeymcfake - The Dominions notepad, which I summoned up from my local supermarket, and which I highly recommend to all Dom MP-ers  , tells me that it was just a 'peace' agreement we had, and not any sort of NAP. But as you say, all besides the point now  Looking forward to a good war ahead though. And win or lose, I hope we both have a blast 
|

October 9th, 2008, 05:50 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
hoo has asked for a 4 hour delay. I have granted it in trade for someone's first born child.
|

October 9th, 2008, 05:58 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 477
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AreaOfEffect
hoo has asked for a 4 hour delay. I have granted it in trade for someone's first born child.
|
I'm calling "not it" on this one.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|