MP Rothfuss- Running - Page 17

zzcat · #1 February 22nd, 2009, 05:07 AM

Hmm... It's really strange for me that Arcoscephale should turn to me when Gift of Nature's Bounty has been risen. If we left Eriu undisturbed with 4500+ income per turn, we are all doomed. IMO a crusade against Eriu is most reasonable choice for all nations who border Eriu. But see what happens? We are fighting each other and weakening ourselves when Eriu becomes stronger and stronger???

With the NAP cancelled. I think we can attack each other at turn 42? So let's prepare for a big war

Quote:

Originally Posted by Incabulos

The nation of Arcoscephale hereby gives notice that we are dissolving our NAP with Ashdod and hostilities may commence 3 turns hence.

Incabulos · #2 February 22nd, 2009, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zzcat

Hmm... It's really strange for me that Arcoscephale should turn to me when Gift of Nature's Bounty has been risen. If we left Eriu undisturbed with 4500+ income per turn, we are all doomed. IMO a crusade against Eriu is most reasonable choice for all nations who border Eriu. But see what happens? We are fighting each other and weakening ourselves when Eriu becomes stronger and stronger???

With the NAP cancelled. I think we can attack each other at turn 42? So let's prepare for a big war

Quote:

Originally Posted by Incabulos

The nation of Arcoscephale hereby gives notice that we are dissolving our NAP with Ashdod and hostilities may commence 3 turns hence.

turn 41 by my count since I posted before submitting the previous turn, should have sent an in game message to make the timing clear but the whole NAP is still quite a new concept to me.

and since I have watched your research spike, your gem income go through the roof and seen your sc/thugs in action I am pretty sure you are the greater threat.

If you think it should be tuurn 32 that is fine by me too. Just let me know here.

zzcat · #3 February 22nd, 2009, 10:19 PM

I have little MP experience too so I don't know if there is any common rule to judge the case

Anyway, it's not a big matter, turn 41 is OK with me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Incabulos

turn 41 by my count since I posted before submitting the previous turn, should have sent an in game message to make the timing clear but the whole NAP is still quite a new concept to me.

and since I have watched your research spike, your gem income go through the roof and seen your sc/thugs in action I am pretty sure you are the greater threat.

If you think it should be tuurn 32 that is fine by me too. Just let me know here.

Juffos · #4 February 22nd, 2009, 07:50 AM

Yes, I am going to annihilate you all with my endless supply of slingers. Too bad I lack the artifacts, recruitable supercombatants, research, magical diversity and late game power of Ashdod.

Ashdod trying to convince the world of Eriu's dangerousness...

NKIcan · #5 February 23rd, 2009, 10:26 PM

Just to let you know: Pythium has attacked without warning and broke the NAP without notice that we had with it.

I think he really overestimates what he can do, given the makeup of his forces. Still, let all be aware not to make deals with him.

If any opponent of Pythiums would like some support, let me know and I'll send you a ton o' gems and items that I have in excess.

Redeyes · #6 February 24th, 2009, 05:31 AM

There was no nap ^
In fact, you could call me... at war with everyone.
Pythium the Napless, who has no naps.

Burnsaber · #7 February 26th, 2009, 12:07 AM

Okay guys, I'm going to my sister's wedding and once this turn is hosted, the game will be on hold until monday.

Incabulos · #8 February 26th, 2009, 12:23 AM

weddings...huzzah... get drunk and say something highly inappropriate about the couple on my behalf

Trumanator · #9 February 26th, 2009, 01:52 AM

"I love weddings, drinks all around!"

Make sure to watch Wedding Crashers before you go, so many good tips...

Juffos · #10 March 4th, 2009, 06:53 AM

Marignon has staled thrice a row.