|
|
|
 |

March 19th, 2003, 03:49 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Vectorian Mainframe Productions
Unless the anti-matter ships are so kind as to have an energy-to-matter conVersion field surround all of their ships. 
__________________
The Unpronounceable Krsqk
"Well, sir, at the moment my left processor doesn't know what my right is doing." - Freefall
|

March 20th, 2003, 05:30 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 794
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Vectorian Mainframe Productions
So how can I can make the AM ships able to filter out Energy weapons from physical ones.
And YES an Anti-Matter Torp would hurt a AM ship as the torp has a matter casing 
|

March 20th, 2003, 06:18 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Vectorian Mainframe Productions
Quote:
So how can I can make the AM ships able to filter out Energy weapons from physical ones.
|
You can not do that directly.
An AM explosion would hurt an AM ship. I think you are not entirely sure of what anti-matter is, and are assigning a lot of qualities to it that it does not possess. Anti-matter is identical to matter in all macroscopic regards. It is only different on the nuclear scale, where some of the charges of the sub-atomic particles are reversed. This does not really cause much different behavior though.
Matter is no more devastating to anti-matter than anti-matter is to matter.
[ March 20, 2003, 04:19: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]
|

March 20th, 2003, 06:32 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Vectorian Mainframe Productions
"An AM explosion would hurt an AM ship."
An AM torp, sure, since it has a matter component too. But something like the anti-proton beam, which is just, well, anti-protons, wouldn't do much.
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

March 20th, 2003, 06:46 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Vectorian Mainframe Productions
It would have similar effects that a matter weapon has on a matter ship. It would not do much less damage.
|

March 20th, 2003, 06:51 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 794
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Vectorian Mainframe Productions
Oooh okay lol thanks.
So...how would i go about making an Anti-Matter ship...can someone please explain this if not ill just abandon that idea lol
|

March 20th, 2003, 06:55 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Vectorian Mainframe Productions
You can't really accurately model anti-matter ships and matter ships in SE4. It does not have the complexity necessary to do so. You would have to make weapons do varying damage based on the target type, which you can not do. None of the various armor abilities would be very accurate either. And, using any of them would conflict with their use on "normal" components.
The problem is that a DUC should have major effects on an anti-matter ship (though not destroyed in one hit or anything), and relatively minor effect (what it has now) on a matter ship. APBs should be the opposite, lots of damage to matter ships, less to anti-matter ships. There is not really a good way to do this.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|