End of Time 3 - Running - Page 7

johnarryn · #61 November 1st, 2009, 11:08 PM

Pythium staled, as did Utgard (you can look at this on the llamaserver).

Utgard staling was my fault. He had asked me for an additional 4 hour delay, which i thought i had inputted, but apparently did not. I've already apologized to him, it was a crappy mistake =(

Alpine Joe · #62 November 1st, 2009, 11:16 PM

SOrry about the stale, but with my commanders scripted and awaiting the final battle I don't find myself doing much with my turns.....now if Gath or Ulm would just finish me off!

Maerlande · #63 November 2nd, 2009, 12:47 AM

Are you going to offer a rollback for Utgard?

Quitti · #64 November 2nd, 2009, 02:00 AM

You can check llamaserver game stales from the webpage -> game page -> admin options -> staling data. While it's in located in the "admin" part of the game, anyone can access it.

I'm usually not a fan of rollbacks...

Erebus · #65 November 2nd, 2009, 03:12 AM

The situation between Utgård and C'tis is quite delicate at the moment. So if Utgård wants a rollback, it's for a good reason.

Deathjester · #66 November 2nd, 2009, 03:46 AM

I (Utgard) did, yes. It seemed there was a misunderstanding with regards to the postponing of the hosting. Very bad timing.

Edit: If a rollback is doable (I have little experience, except a small 2-player game once), it would make a big difference for my chances of survival, simply put.

Deathjester · #67 November 2nd, 2009, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erebus

The situation between Utgård and C'tis is quite delicate at the moment. So if Utgård wants a rollback, it's for a good reason.

Coming from the god of C'tis, that's a honorable statement. Thanks.

johnarryn · #68 November 2nd, 2009, 09:52 AM

Im just going to go ahead and roll it back as an executive decision, so people, please take the same actions you did previously (except for Utgard and anyone interacting with him) so as not to gain any advantage from this.... ill trust everyone to abide by that.

Actually, looking at the llamaserver faq, it seems that as long as deathjester sends in his .2h and no one else does, they will all take the same actions as they would have anyhow. So NO ONE ELSE SEND IN A .2h but Deathjester

johnarryn · #69 November 2nd, 2009, 11:16 AM

Folks,

I rolled back the turn, and then allowed Utgard to take his turn. I then hosted... your old orders should have been the same. Let me know if this is not the case.

We will otherwise proceed as normal. So make sure you send in the .2h for the most recent turn.

Maerlande · #70 November 2nd, 2009, 11:34 AM

Status page is sitting at turn 33 with only Utgard submitted. No turn received.